AI Article Synopsis

  • Dexamethasone is commonly used for preventing nausea and vomiting in chemotherapy patients but has notable side effects, leading to the exploration of a steroid-free antiemetic regimen.
  • The study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of a combination of palonosetron, aprepitant, and olanzapine in patients receiving cisplatin, finding a total control rate of 31.3% and complete response rates of 61.4%, 84.3%, and 65.1% in different phases.
  • While the primary endpoint wasn't met, the complete response rates were comparable to traditional regimens, suggesting this dexamethasone-free option could be beneficial for patients unable to use corticosteroids.

Article Abstract

Dexamethasone is one of the key antiemetic agents and is widely used even now. However, dexamethasone has been associated with several adverse reactions even after short-term administration. Therefore, developing a steroid-free antiemetic regimen is an important issue to consider. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of palonosetron, aprepitant, and olanzapine in a multi-institutional phase II study. Chemotherapy-naive patients scheduled to receive cisplatin were enrolled and evaluated for the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during 120 h after chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the study was total control (TC) in the overall phase. The key secondary endpoint was complete response (CR), which was assessed in the acute, delayed, and overall phase, respectively. Adverse events were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Eighty-five patients were enrolled from 8 centers in Japan, of which 83 were evaluable for analyses. The percentage of patients who achieved TC during the overall phase was 31.3%. CR was achieved in 61.4%, 84.3%, and 65.1% of patients during the overall, acute, and delayed phases, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse event was anorexia. The primary endpoint was below the threshold and we could not find benefit in the dexamethasone-free regimen, but CR during the overall phase was similar to that of the conventional three-drug regimen. This antiemetic regimen without dexamethasone might be an option for patients for whom corticosteroids should not be an active application.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-023-01414-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

palonosetron aprepitant
8
aprepitant olanzapine
8
antiemetic regimen
8
primary endpoint
8
acute delayed
8
adverse events
8
regimen
5
phase
5
patients
5
multicenter phase
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The review analyzes the effectiveness of new antiemetic medications versus traditional ones for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
  • It finds that novel agents like netupitant/palonosetron and olanzapine are at least as effective, if not better, than standard antiemetic treatments that use aprepitant and other agents.
  • The study calls for more direct comparisons and larger trials to further understand the benefits of these new therapies in everyday clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Dexamethasone, commonly used to prevent nausea from chemotherapy, has side effects that prompt the search for alternatives without it.
  • This study tested the efficacy and safety of palonosetron, aprepitant, and olanzapine in chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients, assessing their effectiveness in controlling nausea and vomiting.
  • Results showed low total control rates (17.1%) for antiemetic therapies excluding dexamethasone, though olanzapine could be a viable replacement for patients unable to use dexamethasone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare multiple antiemetic treatments, analyzing data from 16 randomized controlled trials involving over 3,000 patients.
  • * Results indicate that NK1 antagonists combined with ondansetron are the most effective option for preventing CINV in children, particularly when given with dexamethasone, while olanzapine also shows significant benefits when added to certain regimens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite guidelines for managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), there remains a need to clarify the optimal use of neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists. Comparing the effectiveness of NEPA (netupitant-palonosetron) plus dexamethasone with other NK1 antagonist-based regimens combined with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone is crucial for informed decision-making and improving patient outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to assess randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of NEPA plus dexamethasone and other NK1 antagonist-based regimens combined with a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!