A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Molecular distribution of biocide resistance genes and susceptibility to biocides among vancomycin resistant (VRSA) isolates from intensive care unit (ICU) of cardiac hospital- A first report from Pakistan. | LitMetric

Background: The study was conducted with the aim to investigate the VRSA isolates in terms of their susceptibility to routinely used biocides influenced by the co-occurrence of biocide resistant gene (BRGs) and efflux pumps genes.

Methodology: Frequently touched surfaces within intensive care unit (ICU) of cardiac hospital were classified into three primary sites i.e., structure, machines and miscellaneous. Over a period of six months (January 2021 to July 2021) twenty three swabs samples were collected from these sites. Subsequently, these samples underwent both phenotypic and molecular methods for VRSA isolation and identification. Susceptibility and efficacy testing of biocides (benzalkonium chloride (BAC), cetrimide (CET) and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)) were evaluated using microdilution broth and suspension method. Furthermore, specific primers were used for singleplex PCR targeting BRGs (A, A, and E) and efflux pump (A, B, C, A, A and A) associated genes.

Results: We found that 72.2 % demonstrate the presence of A or B genes with no significant difference among three sites ( > 0.05). A is the most dominant BRGs followed by A and E from structure site as compared to other sites (p < 0.05). BAC showed reduced biocide susceptibility and MIC50. There was no significant difference between presence or absence of BRGs and high MIC values of VRSA isolates from all three sites. However, efflux pump genes (EFPGs) particularly A and A + A had a significant association with BRGs and reduced biocide.

Conclusion: BAC is the most effective disinfectant against VRSA. Proper and controlled use of BAC is required to overcome the VRSA contamination. We recommend continuous monitoring of the BRGs prevalence for better prevention of microorganism dissemination and infection control in hospitals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10686860PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22120DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vrsa isolates
8
intensive care
8
care unit
8
unit icu
8
icu cardiac
8
brgs efflux
8
molecular distribution
4
distribution biocide
4
biocide resistance
4
resistance genes
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!