A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

In vitro comparative study of wall portbased high-frequency chest wall oscillation device and internal air-pulse generator device. | LitMetric

Owing to environmental and disease issues, the use of high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) devices in hospitals is consistently increasing. This study proposes a cost-effective actuator-less HFCWO device that utilizes an external wall port utility in hospitals to generate the positive and negative pneumatic pressures required for HFCWO treatment instead of an embedded mechanical actuator. The manufactured prototype with the no-amplification (NO-AMP) setting contained an electric pressure regulator to enable intensity level adjustment and two solenoid valves to enable vibration frequency adjustment, whereas the prototype with the pre-amplification (PRE-AMP) setting contained an additional air reservoir and an air-pressure booster. The prototype device was tuned to output average local maximum values in the pressure waveform similar to a commercial VEST-205 device at an 8-12 Hz frequency and 2-4 pressure intensity levels. In vitro comparative experiments demonstrated that the prototype device showed similar local maximum pressures to those of the VEST-205 (mean absolute pressure difference, <3 mmHO); in contrast, the proposed device showed significantly higher local minimum pressures than those of the VEST-205 (mean absolute pressure difference, >8 mmHO). Additionally, the driving sound of the proposed device was 17.0-17.8 dB higher than that of VEST-205. We conclude that the proposed device has the potential to substitute for conventional HFCWO devices under the limited but most frequently used operating conditions, although more detailed modifications are necessary in future studies to improve its performance and clinical usability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09544119231214620DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vitro comparative
8
high-frequency chest
8
chest wall
8
wall oscillation
8
device
8
hfcwo devices
8
setting contained
8
prototype device
8
local maximum
8
proposed device
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!