Performance on a target acquisition task differs between augmented reality and touch screen displays.

Appl Ergon

University of Michigan, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, USA; University of Michigan, Department of Robotics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Published: April 2024

Target acquisition tasks quantify human motor and perceptual abilities while performing discrete tasks to support interface design and sensorimotor assessments. This study investigated the effects of display, Touchscreen and Augmented Reality (AR), on a standardized 2D multidirectional target acquisition task. Thirty-two participants performed the target acquisition task with both modality types and at two indexes of difficulty. The touchscreen modality yielded improved performance over AR as measured by accuracy, precision, error rates, throughput, and movement time. Throughput using the nominal index of difficulty was 10.12 bits/s for touchscreen and 3.11 bits/s for AR. AR designers can use the results to improve performance when designing AR interfaces by selecting larger buttons when accuracy and efficiency are required and by embedding perception cues to button target surfaces such as depth and proximity cues.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104185DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

target acquisition
16
acquisition task
12
augmented reality
8
performance target
4
acquisition
4
task differs
4
differs augmented
4
reality touch
4
touch screen
4
screen displays
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!