AI Article Synopsis

  • Multi-centre trials are essential for evidence-based medicine, but starting them can be delayed due to lengthy ethics and governance approval processes, which this study aimed to investigate.
  • The study analyzed factors such as disease area, trial phase, site ownership, and specific ethics processes, using data from 150 activations across 91 sites and 16 trials in five countries over eight years.
  • Results showed that the overall median activation time was 234 days, with ethics and governance approvals averaging 48 and 34 days respectively; shorter approval times were linked to factors like disease area (notably oncology) and the use of scope guidelines and triage processes.

Article Abstract

Background: The findings from multi-centre trials are central to the practice of evidence-based medicine, enabling the development and implementation of new treatments. The time it takes to commence clinical trials at sites can be long, and ethics and governance approvals are key steps on the pathway to site activation. The goal of this study was to explore factors influencing the times to ethics approval, governance approval and site activation for multi-centre clinical trials.

Methods: This paper assessed the associations of trial characteristics (disease area and trial phase), site characteristics (government or private ownership, country) and characteristics of the ethics and governance processes (scope guidelines, mutual acceptance requirements and triage of projects by risk) with times to approvals and activation. Median times were compared between site initiations that were and were not exposed to each characteristic using non-parametric tests in univariable and multivariable regressions.

Results: There were data from 150 site activations done across 91 sites, 16 trials and 5 countries from November 2013 to November 2021. The overall median time to activation was 234 days (range 74 to 657), with ethics approval taking a median of 48 days (0 to 369) and governance approval a median of 34 days (0 to 489). Both the univariable and multivariable analyses identified associations of disease area, particularly oncology (p univariable = 0.012, p multivariable = 0.044), use of scope guidelines (p < 0.001, p = 0.020) and use of a triage process (p < 0.001, 0.043) with shorter median times for governance approval. These characteristics (all p < 0.001) plus early trial phase (p = 0.028) were also predictive of shorter median times for ethics approval in univariable analyses, but none remained predictive in multivariable models (all p > 0.054). The only factors associated with reduced overall time to site activation in both univariable and multivariable analyses were the early trial phase (p < 0.001, p = 0.013) and mutual acceptance of ethics approvals (p = 0.031, p = 0.030).

Interpretation: Times to ethics and governance approvals were only one third of total trial start-up time. Factors influencing times to approval and activation were somewhat inconsistent across analyses, but it seems likely that the introduction of selected governance and ethics processes can reduce approval times.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693024PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07802-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ethics governance
12
factors influencing
8
governance approvals
8
clinical trials
8
site activation
8
ethics approval
8
governance approval
8
disease area
8
scope guidelines
8
univariable multivariable
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!