A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Bone Quality in Competitive Athletes: A Systematic Review. | LitMetric

Bone Quality in Competitive Athletes: A Systematic Review.

J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact

McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Published: December 2023

The study objective was to assess bone quality measured by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in competitive athletes. Medline, EMBASE and Sport Discus were searched through May 2022. Prior to submission, a follow-up database search was performed (January 2023). Studies of competitive athletes using HR-pQCT to assess bone quality were included. Athletes were aged between 14 and 45 years. Data extraction included study design and location (country), skeletal imaging modality and site, bone variables and any additional musculoskeletal-related outcome. Information identifying sports and athletes were also extracted. This review included 14 manuscripts and a total of 928 individuals (male: n=75; female: n=853). Athletes comprised 78% (n=722) of the included individuals and 93% of athletes were female. Assessment scores indicate the studies were good to fair quality. The athletes included in this review can be categorized into three groups: 1) healthy athletes, 2) athletes with compromised menstrual function (e.g., amenorrhoea), and 3) athletes with compromised bone health (e.g., bone stress injuries). When assessing bone quality using HR-pQCT, healthy competitive athletes had denser, stronger and larger bones with better microarchitecture, compared with controls. However, the same cannot be said for athletes with amenorrhoea or bone stress injuries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696374PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone quality
16
competitive athletes
16
athletes
13
bone
8
assess bone
8
athletes compromised
8
bone stress
8
stress injuries
8
included
5
competitive
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!