AI Article Synopsis

  • Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is challenging to diagnose in critically ill patients, often leading to excessive antifungal treatments; current markers like serum and peritoneal 1.3-beta-D-glucan (sBDG and pBDG) have shown inconsistent results in identifying IAC due to varying patient populations.
  • This study investigated a high-risk population of critically ill patients undergoing abdominal surgery, aiming to determine the prevalence of IAC and the effectiveness of sBDG and pBDG in its diagnosis, finding a 44% prevalence rate among 199 included patients.
  • Results showed that pBDG levels were significantly higher in patients with IAC compared to those without, suggesting pBDG could be

Article Abstract

Background: Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is difficult to predict in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection, leading to the overuse of antifungal treatments. Serum and peritoneal 1.3-beta-D-glucan (sBDG and pBDG) have been proposed to confirm or invalidate the diagnosis of IAC, but clinical studies have reported inconsistent results, notably because of heterogeneous populations with a low IAC prevalence. This study aimed to identify a high-risk IAC population and evaluate pBDG and sBDG in diagnosing IAC.

Methods: This prospective multicenter noninterventional French study included consecutive critically ill patients undergoing abdominal surgery for abdominal sepsis. The primary objective was to establish the IAC prevalence. The secondary objective was to explore whether sBDG and pBDG could be used to diagnose IAC. Wako beta-glucan test (WT, Fujifilm Wako Chemicals Europe, Neuss, Germany) was used for pBDG measurements. WT and Fungitell beta-D-glucan assay (FA, Associate of Cape Cod, East Falmouth, USA) were used for sBDG measurements.

Results: Between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022, 199 patients were included. Patients were predominantly male (63%), with a median age of 66 [54-72] years. The IAC prevalence was 44% (87/199). The main IAC type was secondary peritonitis. Septic shock occurred in 63% of cases. After multivariate analysis, a nosocomial origin was associated with more IAC cases (P = 0.0399). The median pBDG level was significantly elevated in IAC (448 [107.5-1578.0] pg/ml) compared to non-IAC patients (133 [16.0-831.0] pg/ml), P = 0.0021. For a pBDG threshold of 45 pg/ml, the negative predictive value in assessing IAC was 82.3%. The median sBDG level with WT (n = 42) at day 1 was higher in IAC (5 [3.0-9.0] pg/ml) than in non-IAC patients (3 [3.0-3.0] pg/ml), P = 0.012. Similarly, median sBDG level with FA (n = 140) at day 1 was higher in IAC (104 [38.0-211.0] pg/ml) than in non-IAC patients (50 [23.0-141.0] pg/ml), P = 0.009. Combining a peritonitis score < 3, sBDG < 3.3 pg/ml (WT) and pBDG < 45 pg/ml (WT) yielded a negative predictive value of 100%.

Conclusion: In critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection requiring surgery, the IAC prevalence was 44%. Combining low sBDG and pBDG with a low peritonitis score effectively excluded IAC and could limit unnecessary antifungal agent exposure.

Trial Registration: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number 03997929, first registered on June 24, 2019).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691030PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04761-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iac
13
critically ill
12
ill patients
12
iac prevalence
12
non-iac patients
12
serum peritoneal
8
peritoneal 13-beta-d-glucan
8
intra-abdominal candidiasis
8
patients
8
sbdg pbdg
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!