AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the impact of a clinical pathway on patient outcomes for those with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding through a randomized controlled trial in China.
  • In the trial, patients were split into an intervention group using the clinical pathway and a control group receiving routine care.
  • Results showed the intervention group had shorter hospital stays, lower costs, fewer complications, and higher satisfaction, highlighting the potential benefits of implementing the clinical pathway.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To explore the effects of the clinical pathway on the outcomes of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Materials And Methods: Randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted in two medical centers in China from 1 June 2022 to 31 December 2022. Patients with a diagnosis of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding who provided written informed consent were consecutively assigned to the intervention group. The patients in the intervention group were treated using the clinical pathway, while the control group received routine care and follow-up. Time, cost, complications, and prognostic indicators were analyzed. Intentional-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis were used for data analysis.

Results: A total of 114 eligible patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomly divided into two groups and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In addition, 106 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. The median age of the 106 patients was 57 years (range, 18-92 years) and 83.0% were male. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the baseline characteristics. The intervention group demonstrated a statistically significantly shorter length of stay, lower hospital cost (ie, cost during hospitalization, cost in the emergency room, and cost in the ward), significantly fewer cases of complications, and a higher level of patient satisfaction when compared with the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the rates of transfusion, repeat endoscopy, rebleeding readmission, and mortality.

Conclusion: The implementation of the clinical pathway for patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding may help improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2200060316.

Registration Link: https://www.chictr.org.cn/.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683656PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S433068DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-variceal upper
20
upper gastrointestinal
20
clinical pathway
16
gastrointestinal bleeding
16
patients non-variceal
12
intervention group
12
randomized controlled
8
controlled trial
8
control group
8
per-protocol analysis
8

Similar Publications

ABC score is a better predictor for 30-day mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective single-center study.

Indian J Gastroenterol

December 2024

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576 104, India.

Background: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) still has a mortality rate of about 10%. Several pre-endoscopy scoring systems have been developed to predict the outcome, but none accurately predict mortality. The present study was aimed at comparing the new ABC score (age, blood tests and comorbidities) with other pre-existing scoring systems to predict mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Most studies have shown a declining incidence of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in recent years. Data regarding mortality were controversial; in non-variceal bleeding, the increasing age of the population, increased use of anti-thrombotic and anticoagulant therapy in patients with cardiovascular diseases, and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are counterbalanced by the progress in endoscopic therapy with stable mortality.

Material And Method: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study that included patients admitted with UGIB in Clinical Emergency Hospital Craiova during 2013-2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this editorial we comment on the article by Wang , recently published on . Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) represents a common and potentially serious gastroenterological emergency. Wang conducted a detailed study on the management of ANVUGIB in a high-volume center in the Shaanxi region, China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the incidence and predictors of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as well as the inpatient outcomes associated with this complication.

Methods: This was an analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database from January to December 2020. Adult COVID-19 patients were categorized into two groups based on NVUGIB development during hospitalization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!