A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

U-Shaped Association Between Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio and Risk of Cardiac Conduction Block. | LitMetric

Purpose: Inflammation plays a critical role in the development of cardiac conduction block (CCB), which is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) acts as a novel inflammatory marker; however, its association with CCB has not yet been studied. This study aimed to investigate the association between MLR and CCB risk.

Patients And Methods: In total, 82,472 CCB-free participants were identified from the Kailuan study. MLR was calculated using the monocyte count/lymphocyte count. The participants were stratified based on quartiles of MLR levels. Incident CCB and its subtypes were ascertained from electrocardiograms at biennial follow-up visits. The Cox proportional hazards model and restricted cubic spline analysis were used to investigate the association between MLR with CCB and its subtypes.

Results: During a median follow-up of 10.4 years, 3222 incident CCB cases were observed. A U-shaped association was observed between MLR and CCB risk ( <0.05). After multivariate adjustment, individuals in the highest MLR quartile had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.212 (95% CI: 1.097-1.340; Q4 vs Q2), while those in the lowest MLR quartile had an HR of 1.106 (95% CI: 1.000-1.224; Q1 vs Q2). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses yielded consistent results. The U-shaped association persisted for atrioventricular block (AVB) in subtype analyses.

Conclusion: MLR was significantly associated with an increased risk of new-onset CCB. Assessing MLR may have clinical relevance for predicting CCB risk, providing valuable insights for preventive strategies and patient management.

Pre-registered Clinical Trial Number: The pre-registered clinical trial number is ChiCTR-TNC-11001489.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664808PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S438722DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mlr ccb
12
u-shaped association
8
monocyte-lymphocyte ratio
8
cardiac conduction
8
conduction block
8
investigate association
8
association mlr
8
incident ccb
8
ccb
7
mlr
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!