A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Dosimetric impact of applicator displacement on three-dimensional image-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatments for cervical cancer. | LitMetric

Purpose: To determine the dosimetric impact of brachytherapy applicator displacement during intracavitary (IC) and combined intracavitary/interstitial (IC/IS) high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Material And Methods: Data from 27 consecutively treated patients undergoing IC or IC/IS high-dose-rate brachytherapy with tandem and ovoid-based applicators at a single academic medical center were analyzed. Virtual applicator displacements (a single shift of whole applicator with tandem/ovoid/associated needles) of 0 (clinical position), 2, 5, 7, and 10 mm in the inferior direction were modeled on treatment planning CT or MRI scans, with maintaining the same dwell times. Radiation dose to target volumes (D of high-risk clinical target volume) and organs at risk (OARs) (D, D, and D of bladder, rectum, and sigmoid) were calculated for each virtual applicator shift, and significance of displacements was assessed using general linear model and Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: Mean dose to high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) D was 95.7%, 88.9%, 84.6%, and 77.1% of the prescribed dose in clinical position with displacements of 2, 5, 7, and 10 mm, respectively. Rectal D significantly increased by 28% and 44% at displacement of 7 mm and 10 mm, respectively. IC/IS cases showed relatively greater dosimetric differences than IC cases, with HR-CTV D doses of 94.4%, 85.8%, 80.4%, and 72.4% at virtual displacements of 2, 5, 7, and 10 mm, respectively.

Conclusions: Applicator displacements of 5 mm or greater result in statistically significant and clinically meaningful decreases in radiation dose to HR-CTV during 3-dimensional high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment planning, with corresponding increase in radiation dose to the rectum. IC/IS applicator displacements lead to relatively greater differences than those of IC applicators.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10669918PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.132697DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high-dose-rate brachytherapy
16
applicator displacements
12
radiation dose
12
dosimetric impact
8
applicator displacement
8
ic/is high-dose-rate
8
brachytherapy treatment
8
virtual applicator
8
clinical position
8
treatment planning
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!