A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Modeling and Experimental Investigation of Sulfurous Compounds Removal from Gas Condensate through Ultrasound-Assisted Oxidative Desulfurization Method. | LitMetric

This study employed an ultrasound-assisted oxidative desulfurization process (UAOD) to investigate the degradation of three sulfurous compounds in the synthetic gas condensate. Various parameters, including oxidizers (hydrogen peroxide, sodium peroxide, potassium superoxide), promoters (formic acid, acetic acid), catalysts (phosphotungstic acid, ferrous(II) sulfate, zirconium dioxide, vanadium pentoxide, aluminum oxide γ, copper(II) oxide), and phase transfer agents (isobutanol, tetraoctylammonium bromide, and tetra--butylammonium fluoride), were examined to identify the optimal combination for reducing sulfurous compounds in the UAOD process. The influence of the extraction stage and reactor vessel material on the desulfurization efficiency was also investigated. Results revealed that hydrogen peroxide, formic acid, phosphotungstic acid, and isobutyl alcohol were the most effective oxidizers, promoters, catalysts, and phase transfer agents, respectively. Response surface methodology was used to determine the optimal conditions by evaluating different concentrations of these reagents within specific ranges. The study considered ranges such as 10-70 vol % of hydrogen peroxide, 5-70 vol % of formic acid, 1-30 wt % of phosphotungstic acid, 1-30 vol % of isobutanol, and 5-40 min of ultrasonic ripple time. Empirical models were developed for each sulfurous compound type, providing optimal conditions for sulfur removal with an error margin of less than 0.1%. The validity of the suggested models was confirmed through an industrial data analysis. Additionally, it was observed that increasing the number of extraction stages improved desulfurization efficiency, and using a stainless-steel reactor vessel was more suitable than using a glass vessel.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10652721PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05193DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sulfurous compounds
12
hydrogen peroxide
12
formic acid
12
phosphotungstic acid
12
gas condensate
8
ultrasound-assisted oxidative
8
oxidative desulfurization
8
phase transfer
8
transfer agents
8
reactor vessel
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!