AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed the effectiveness of video laryngoscopes (VL) versus direct laryngoscopes (DL) during intubations performed by emergency department residents.
  • Results showed that VL had a higher first-attempt success rate (77%) compared to DL (64%), which was statistically significant after adjusting for various factors.
  • Additionally, using VL was linked to a lower occurrence of adverse events (both overall and minor), suggesting it may improve patient safety during intubation procedures.

Article Abstract

Background: The video laryngoscope (VL) has been widely used for intubation in the emergency department (ED). However, their effectiveness remains controversial, particularly among airway management performed by residents in the ED.

Methods: We aimed to examine whether the use of VL, compared to a direct laryngoscope (DL), was associated with higher first-attempt intubation success among intubations performed by residents in the ED. This is a secondary analysis of the data from a prospective, observational, multicentre study of 15 Japanese EDs from April 2012 through March 2020. We included all adult patients who underwent intubation with VL or DL by residents (postgraduate years ≤5) in the ED. The outcome measures were first-pass success and intubation-related adverse events (overall, major, and minor adverse events). To determine the association of VL use with each of the outcomes, we constructed logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to account for patients clustering within the ED, adjusting for patient demographics, primary indications, intubation difficulty, and intubation methods.

Results: Of 5,261 eligible patients who underwent an initial intubation attempt by residents, 1,858 (35%) patients were attempted with VL. Intubations performed with VL had a non-significantly higher first-pass success rate than those with DL (77% vs. 64%; unadjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.20; 95% CI=0.87-1.65; P=0.27). This association was significant after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67; P=0.01). As for adverse events, the use of VL was associated with a lower rate of any (adjusted OR=0.67; 95% CI=0.51-0.86; P=0.002) and minor (adjusted OR=0.69; 95% CI=0.55-0.87; P=0.002) adverse events.

Conclusion: The use of VL was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate and a lower rate of any adverse events compared to that with DL among intubations performed by residents in the EDs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10665768PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47563DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intubations performed
16
performed residents
16
adverse events
16
first-pass success
12
video laryngoscope
8
compared direct
8
direct laryngoscope
8
emergency department
8
associated higher
8
higher first-attempt
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!