AI Article Synopsis

  • Clubfoot, a common foot deformity in infants, has various treatment options, with the Ponseti method being a key focus for evaluating clinical outcomes.
  • A systematic review of randomized controlled trials analyzed different interventions, including modified Ponseti techniques and surgical options, to determine their effectiveness in treating idiopathic clubfoot.
  • Results indicated that the Ponseti method generally provided the best overall outcomes, while modifications like the accelerated Ponseti method showed advantages in specific areas like time in casts and surgery necessity.

Article Abstract

Background: Clubfoot, or congenital talipes equinovarus deformity, is a common anomaly affecting the foot in infants. However, clinical equipoise remains between different interventions, especially those based on the Ponseti method. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of the various interventions for treating idiopathic clubfoot.

Methods: Searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL were conducted. Randomized controlled trials comparing different interventions, including the Ponseti method, accelerated Ponseti method, Ponseti method with botulinum toxin type A (Botox) injection, Ponseti method with early tibialis anterior tendon transfer (TATT), Kite method, and surgical treatment, were included. Network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. The primary outcomes were the change in total Pirani score and maximal ankle dorsiflexion. Secondary outcomes were the number of casts, time in casts, and rates of tenotomy, total complications, relapse, adverse events, and additional required major surgery.

Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials involving 740 feet were included. According to the SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve)-based relative ranking, the Ponseti method was associated with the best outcomes in terms of Pirani score changes, maximal ankle dorsiflexion, number of casts, adverse events, and total complications, whereas the accelerated Ponseti method was associated with the best outcomes in terms of time in casts and tenotomy rate. Early TATT ranked best in terms of relapse rate. The Ponseti method with Botox injection was associated with the best outcomes in terms of the need for additional major surgery.

Conclusions: The NMAs suggest that the Ponseti method is the optimal treatment overall, despite potential drawbacks such as longer time in casts and higher rates of tenotomy, relapse, and the need for additional surgery compared with other modified approaches. Therefore, clinicians should consider how treatments can be tailored individually.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.22.01210DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ponseti method
36
controlled trials
16
randomized controlled
12
time casts
12
associated best
12
best outcomes
12
outcomes terms
12
method
10
ponseti
9
optimal treatment
8

Similar Publications

Review Article: Current Concepts in the Treatment of Congenital Clubfoot.

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)

December 2024

Rede Mater Dei de Saúde, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Congenital clubfoot is a complex, frequent deformity that can be challenging even in experienced hands. The Ponseti method remains universally accepted as the gold standard for treatment, and excellent outcomes are within expectations in most cases with appropriate technical management. Recurrences continue to be a problem and are mainly associated with non-compliance with orthosis use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Ponseti method for clubfoot treatment is a non-surgical treatment with a successful outcome. However, many children are not able to complete Ponseti treatment due to various barriers and are termed dropout children. This study aimed to find out the factors responsible for dropout from clubfoot treatment in Peshawar, Pakistan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The study aimed to quantify and correlate kinematic coupling linkage of foot abduction (correction of adduction) and inversion, heel varus and ankle equinus for clubfeet corrected by Ponseti technique.

Methods: Measurements of foot abduction (derotation of carpopedal block), heel varus and ankle equinus were available from Dimeglio scores in 25 feet. Radiological angles were considered for foot inversion-eversion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Idiopathic clubfoot (IC) can be initially corrected with the Ponseti method, but often recurs, potentially due to various unknown genetic and environmental factors, including a specific genetic marker (rs274503) found in Caucasian children.
  • An 11-center study involving 516 IC patients and 661 healthy children in China identified that the G variant of rs274503 is linked to a higher risk of developing IC, particularly in cases with bilateral involvement.
  • While the G variant of rs274503 was associated with increased IC risk, the results were not significant in all genetic models, indicating the need for more research to validate these findings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Clubfoot is a common birth defect affecting 1 in 1000 babies, and the Ponseti method is a widely used treatment involving manipulation, casting, and orthotic use, but many patients face issues with recurrence of the deformity.
  • - A study tracked 127 clubfoot patients from 2010 to 2014, assessing caregivers' experiences with the Ponseti method through questionnaires, focusing on their beliefs about the necessity and use of braces.
  • - Results indicated that caregivers who doubted the need for braces or felt uncomfortable using them were significantly more likely to experience treatment failure, highlighting the importance of addressing caregiver concerns to improve treatment outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!