AI Article Synopsis

  • - In face-to-face communication, multimodal cues like prosody, gestures, and mouth movements help both native (L1) and non-native (L2) language processing, but their effects on L2 comprehension are less understood.
  • - The study measured the impact of these multimodal cues on L2 comprehenders by analyzing their brain responses to language while watching videos, finding that these cues can facilitate comprehension but are used less effectively by L2 learners than by L1 speakers.
  • - Results indicated that while L2 comprehenders benefitted from meaningful gestures and informative mouth movements, they overall relied on multimodal cues to a lesser extent than L1 comprehenders, who processed all types of cues more efficiently.

Article Abstract

In face-to-face communication, multimodal cues such as prosody, gestures, and mouth movements can play a crucial role in language processing. While several studies have addressed how these cues contribute to native (L1) language processing, their impact on non-native (L2) comprehension is largely unknown. Comprehension of naturalistic language by L2 comprehenders may be supported by the presence of (at least some) multimodal cues, as these provide correlated and convergent information that may aid linguistic processing. However, it is also the case that multimodal cues may be less used by L2 comprehenders because linguistic processing is more demanding than for L1 comprehenders, leaving more limited resources for the processing of multimodal cues. In this study, we investigated how L2 comprehenders use multimodal cues in naturalistic stimuli (while participants watched videos of a speaker), as measured by electrophysiological responses (N400) to words, and whether there are differences between L1 and L2 comprehenders. We found that prosody, gestures, and informative mouth movements each reduced the N400 in L2, indexing easier comprehension. Nevertheless, L2 participants showed weaker effects for each cue compared to L1 comprehenders, with the exception of meaningful gestures and informative mouth movements. These results show that L2 comprehenders focus on specific multimodal cues - meaningful gestures that support meaningful interpretation and mouth movements that enhance the acoustic signal - while using multimodal cues to a lesser extent than L1 comprehenders overall.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682458PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47643-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multimodal cues
32
mouth movements
16
cues
9
prosody gestures
8
language processing
8
comprehenders
8
linguistic processing
8
gestures informative
8
informative mouth
8
meaningful gestures
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!