A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Formulation and In Vivo Evaluation of Biofilm Loaded with Silver Sulfadiazine for Burn Healing. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • * An effective formulation was created using specific concentrations of CS (0.833%) and SA (0.75%), which showed nearly complete release of SSD in 6 hours and demonstrated strong antibacterial properties.
  • * In animal tests, the SSD biofilm led to a 75% decrease in wound size, outperforming both a standard cream (57% reduction) and an untreated group (0% reduction).

Article Abstract

Infected burned skin is a life-threatening condition, which may lead to sepsis. The aims of this work are to formulate a biofilm composed of silver sulfadiazine (SSD), chitosan (CS), and sodium alginate (SA), and to evaluate its wound-healing effectiveness. A full factorial design was used to formulate different matrix formulations. The prepared biofilm was tested for physicochemical, and in vitro release. The optimized formulation is composed of 0.833% of CS and 0.75% of SA. The release of SSD almost reached 100% after 6 h. The mechanical properties of the optimized formula were reasonable. The antibacterial activity for the optimized biofilm was significantly higher than that of blank biofilm, which is composed of CS and SA, = 1.53922 × 10. Moreover, the in vivo study showed a 75% reduction in wound width when using the formulated SSD biofilm compared to standard marketed cream (57%) and the untreated group (0%).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10670614PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/gels9110855DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

silver sulfadiazine
8
biofilm composed
8
biofilm
6
formulation vivo
4
vivo evaluation
4
evaluation biofilm
4
biofilm loaded
4
loaded silver
4
sulfadiazine burn
4
burn healing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!