AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of hypomethylating agents, azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC), for treating patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), a serious type of bone marrow disorder, using real-world data from the SEER-Medicare database.
  • Out of 973 patients aged 66 and older, those treated with AZA had a median overall survival of 13.9 months and a 38% rate of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with similar outcomes for DEC, indicating no significant differences between the two treatments.
  • The results showed that the median overall survival was shorter in real-world settings compared to

Article Abstract

Background: We sought to understand the clinical effectiveness associated with use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DEC) for patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB; an established proxy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms) in contemporary and representative real-world settings.

Patients And Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, a linkage of cancer registry and Medicare claims data, to identify patients aged ≥ 66 years diagnosed with RAEB, between 2009 and 2017 in the United States, and who received AZA or DEC as first-line therapy. Outcomes measured were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and incidence of progression-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Results: Of 973 eligible patients, 738 (75.8%) received AZA and 235 (24.2%) received DEC; 6.4% received hematopoietic cell transplantation during follow-up. In the overall population, median OS was 13.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.9-15.0), median EFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 4.9-5.7), and 38.0% of patients progressed to AML. Incidences of AML progression and death were 25.6% and 29.9%, respectively, at Year 1, and 34.3% and 44.8%, respectively, at Year 2. There were no significant differences in clinical benefits between AZA and DEC.

Conclusion: Median OS with both HMAs remained significantly shorter than in the AZA-001 clinical trial, highlighting how patient outcomes vary between clinical and real-world settings. Further research is required to understand why these disparities exist.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2023.10.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients refractory
8
refractory anemia
8
anemia excess
8
excess blasts
8
blasts raeb
8
hypomethylating agents
8
agents hmas
8
received aza
8
months 95%
8
clinical
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!