AI Article Synopsis

  • - Current guidelines suggest monitoring small, asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and elective repair is recommended for diameters ≥ 5.5 cm in men and ≥ 5.0 cm in women; however, the necessity of elective repair may not apply to all patients, especially those with a short life expectancy.
  • - This multicenter study analyzed data from 1,500 patients treated in European aortic centers between 2001 and 2021 to validate a predictive model for patient survival, which considers factors like age, kidney function, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
  • - Results indicated a high mortality rate (54.6%) during a median follow-up of 65 months, with specific

Article Abstract

Objective: Current guidelines recommend diameter monitoring of small and asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) due to the low risk of rupture. Elective AAA repair is recommended for diameters ≥ 5.5 cm in men and ≥ 5.0 cm in women. However, data supporting the efficacy of elective treatment for all patients above these thresholds are diverging. For a subgroup of patients, life expectancy might be very short, and elective AAA repair at the current threshold may not be justified. This study aimed to externally validate a predictive model for survival of patients with an asymptomatic AAA treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Methods: This was a multicentre international retrospective observational cohort study. Data were collected from four European aortic centres treating patients between 2001 and 2021. The initial model included age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as independent predictors for survival. Model performance was measured by discrimination and calibration.

Results: The validation cohort included 1 500 patients with a median follow up of 65 months, during which 54.6% of the patients died. The external validation showed slightly decreased discrimination ability and signs of overfitting in model calibration. However, a high risk subgroup of patients with impaired survival rates was identified: octogenarians with eGFR < 60 OR COPD, septuagenarians with eGFR < 30, and septuagenarians with eGFR < 60 and COPD having survival rates of only 55.2% and 15.5% at five and 10 years, respectively.

Conclusion: EVAR is a valuable treatment option for AAA, especially for patients unsuitable for open repair. Nonetheless, not all these patients will benefit from EVAR, and an individualised treatment recommendation should include considerations on life expectancy. This study provides a risk stratification to identify patients who may not benefit from EVAR using the present diameter thresholds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients
11
external validation
8
model survival
8
survival patients
8
abdominal aortic
8
aortic aneurysms
8
treated endovascular
8
endovascular aneurysm
8
aneurysm repair
8
elective aaa
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!