https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=37992609&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 379926092024011620240116
1872-77271702024JanEuropean journal of radiologyEur J RadiolUltra-high resolution photon-counting CT with tin prefiltration for bone-metal interface visualization.11120911120910.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111209S0720-048X(23)00523-5To investigate the metal artifact suppression potential of combining tin prefiltration and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) for osseous microarchitecture depiction in ultra-high-resolution (UHR) photon-counting CT (PCCT) of the lower extremity.Derived from tin-filtered UHR scans at 140 kVp, polychromatic datasets (T3D) and VMI reconstructions at 70, 110, 150, and 190 keV were compared in 117 patients with lower extremity metal implants (53 female; 62.1 ± 18.0 years). Three implant groups were investigated (total arthroplasty [n = 48], osteosynthetic material [n = 43], and external fixation [n = 26]). Image quality was assessed with regions of interest placed in the most pronounced artifacts and adjacent soft tissue, measuring the respective attenuation. Additionally, artifact extent, bone-metal interface interpretability and overall image quality were independently evaluated by three radiologists.Artifact reduction was superior with increasing keV level of VMI. While T3D was superior to VMI70keV (p ≥ 0.117), artifacts were more severe in T3D than in VMI ≥ 110 keV (all p ≤ 0.036). Image noise was highest for VMI70keV (all p < 0.001) and lowest for VMI110keV with comparable results for VMI110keV - VMI190keV. Subjective image quality regarding artifacts was superior for VMI ≥ 110 keV (all p ≤ 0.042) and comparable for VMI110keV - VMI190keV. Bone-metal interface interpretability was superior for VMI110keV (all p ≤ 0.001), while T3D, VMI150keV and VMI190keV were comparable. Overall image quality was deemed best for VMI110keV and VMI150keV. Interreader reliability was good in all cases (ICC ≥ 0.833).Tin-filtered UHR-PCCT scans of the lower extremity combined with VMI reconstructions allow for efficient artifact reduction in the vicinity of bone-metal interfaces.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.PatzerTheresa SophieTSDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany. Electronic address: Patzer_T@ukw.de.GrunzJan-PeterJPDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.HuflageHennerHDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.HennesJan-LuccaJLDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.PannenbeckerPaulinePDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.GruschwitzPhilippPDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.AfatSaifSDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.HerrmannJudithJDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.BleyThorsten AlexanderTADepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.KunzAndreas StevenASDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.engJournal Article20231119
IrelandEur J Radiol81064110720-048X7440-31-5Tin0MetalsIMHumansFemaleTinReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedmethodsProstheses and ImplantsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedmethodsMetalsArtifactsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedmethodsSignal-To-Noise RatioRetrospective StudiesCancellous boneMetal artifact reductionPhoton-countingTin prefiltrationTomography, x-ray computedDeclaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology receives research funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG) for photon-counting CT studies. Jan-Peter Grunz [grant number Z-3BC/02], Philipp Gruschwitz [grant number Z-02CSP/18] and Theresa Sophie Patzer [grant number ZZ-36] are financially supported by the Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research Würzburg. Thorsten Alexander Bley, Andreas Steven Kunz and Jan-Peter Grunz have received speaker honoraria from Siemens Healthineers within the past three years. The Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology receives ongoing research funding by Siemens Healthineers outside of the presented work. The authors of this manuscript declare no further relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
2023914202311820231116202411664120231123042202311221811ppublish3799260910.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111209S0720-048X(23)00523-5