Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (hereafter mutation) in the / genes (g); however, clinical benefit has also been demonstrated in mBC with somatic / mutations (s) or germline mutations (g). This study aims to describe the genomic landscape of homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations in mBC and assess PARPi treatment outcomes for patients with g compared with other HRR genes and by status of a novel homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig).
Methods: A real-world (RW) clinico-genomic database (CGDB) of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) linked to deidentified, electronic health record-derived clinical data was used. CGP was analyzed for HRR genes and HRDsig. The CGDB enabled cohort characterization and outcomes analyses of 177 patients exposed to PARPi. RW progression-free survival (rwPFS) and RW overall survival (rwOS) were compared.
Results: Of 28,920 patients with mBC, g was detected in 3.4%, whereas the population with any alteration or g increased to 9.5%. HRDsig+ represented 21% of patients with mBC. and g had higher levels of biallelic loss and HRDsig+ than other HRR alterations. Outcomes on PARPi were assessed for 177 patients, and g and s/ cohorts were similar: g versus s/g rwPFS was 6.3 versus 5.4 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 [0.77-2.43]); rwOS was 16.2 versus 21.2 months (HR, 1.45 [0.74-2.86]). Additionally, patients with HRDsig+ versus HRDsig- had longer rwPFS (6.3 2.8 months; HR, 0.62 [0.42-0.92]) and numerically longer rwOS (17.8 13.0 months; HR, 0.72 [0.46-1.14]).
Conclusion: Patients with s and g derive similar benefit from PARPi as those with g alterations. In combination, HRDsig+, s, and g represent an additional 19% of mBC that can potentially benefit from PARPi. Randomized trials exploring a more inclusive biomarker such as HRDsig are warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681426 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.23.00091 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!