Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Red blood cell antibody elutions are often routinely performed whenever a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) is encountered. To evaluate the efficacy of performing routine red-cell elutions we reviewed our antibody elution data. Of 122 eluates, 83 were negative, 35 were warm panagglutinins, 2 were felt to be transfusion-induced alloantibodies, 1 was passively acquired anti-A, and 1 was inconclusive. One of the eluted alloantibodies was not demonstrable in the serum. Thus, only 1 (0.8%) of the eluates provided important information not readily available through serum testing alone. We conclude that extensive serologic evaluation of a positive DAT should be reserved for those patients who have been recently transfused or are suspected of having immune hemolysis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1423-0410.1986.tb01978.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!