A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Neural underpinnings of response inhibition in substance use disorders: weak meta-analytic evidence for a widely used construct. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Substance use disorders (SUDs) are serious psychiatric issues, and diminished response inhibition may hinder patients’ ability to quit drugs, but existing research on this is inconsistent.
  • The study systematically reviews neuroimaging literature on response inhibition in SUDs, using meta-analysis to better understand functional brain deviations.
  • Results from 21 studies showed some convergence in brain activity, specifically in the right anterior insula, but this finding was not robust, and behavioral data indicated no significant performance differences between SUD samples and controls on inhibition tasks.

Article Abstract

Rationale: Substance use disorders (SUDs) rank among the most severely debilitating psychiatric conditions. Among others, decreased response inhibition capacities could make it more difficult for patients to abstain from drug use and maintain abstinence. However, meta-analyses on the neural basis of response inhibition in SUDs yielded conflicting results.

Objective: In this study, we revisited the neuroimaging research field and summarized the existing fMRI literature on overt response inhibition (Go/NoGo and stop-signal paradigms) across different SUDs.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature review and an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to investigate the actual convergence of functional deviations observed in SUD samples. Results were further supplied by consecutive robustness measures and a post-hoc random-effects meta-analysis of behavioural data.

Results: We identified k = 21 eligible studies for our analysis. The ALE analysis indicated a significant cluster of convergence with its statistical peak in the right anterior insula. Consecutive analyses, however, indicated this result was not robust and susceptible towards publication bias. Additionally, a post-hoc random effects meta-analysis of the behavioural parameters of Go/NoGo and stop-signal paradigms reported by the included studies revealed no significant differences in task performance comparing SUD samples and controls.

Conclusion: We discuss that the role of task-based response inhibition may require some refinement as an overarching marker for SUD pathology. Finally, we give a few prospects for future research that should be further explored in this context.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10774166PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06498-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

response inhibition
20
substance disorders
8
go/nogo stop-signal
8
stop-signal paradigms
8
sud samples
8
meta-analysis behavioural
8
response
5
inhibition
5
neural underpinnings
4
underpinnings response
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!