A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reference intervals and biological variation in parameters of the thrombin generation test in healthy individuals. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study established reference intervals (RIs) and analyzed biological variability (BV) to facilitate the introduction of the thrombin generation test (TGT) into clinical practice.
  • It involved testing platelet-poor plasma (PPP), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and microparticle-mediated TGT in healthy participants, utilizing nested ANOVA for BV evaluation across multiple weeks.
  • Results indicated varying degrees of individual and analytical variation for TGT parameters, leading to recommended RIs for evaluating thrombin generation based on PPP and PRP, with important implications for clinical monitoring.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Establish the referenceintervals (RIs) and analyze biological variability (BV) to introduce the thrombin generation test (TGT) into clinical practice.

Methods: To determine the RIs parameters of TGT, we analyzed platelet-poor plasma (PPP) (n = 123), rich (PRP) (n = 76), and microparticle-mediated TGT (MP-TGT) (n = 32) in healthy participants. For the BV study, we collected samples from five participants over 5 weeks. A nested analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate the BV results.

Results: The between-individual variation (CV ), within-individual variation (CV ), analytical variation (CV ) for TGT on PPP for all parameters were from 5.5% to 17.3%, 5.4% to 17.7%, and 2.6% to 5.3%, respectively. For PRP, the CV , CV , and CV were ranged from 3.0% to 23.7%, 8.4% to 23.0%, and 4.1% to 6.9%, respectively. The index of individuality (II) ranged from 0.3 to 3.1 for PPP and from 0.3 to 4.5 for PRP. The reference change value (RCV) for PPP was from 19.8% to 50.1%, while for PRP, it was 27.2% to 66.5%. We recommend using the RIs for the parameters ETP (nM/min): 1101.6-2332.1 and Peak (nM): 163.5-381.3 for PPP and ETP (nM/min): 1088.5-2634.9; Peak (nM): 72.6-210.7 for PRP. The resulting MP-TGT are highly dependent on age require a larger sample.

Conclusion: For TGT on PPP and PRP the RIs developed on our population for Peak and ETP parameters can be used. Time parameters: Lagtime and ttPeak, min with II < 0.6, require monitoring over time with RCV calculation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14205DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thrombin generation
8
generation test
8
ris parameters
8
tgt ppp
8
ppp prp
8
etp nm/min
8
parameters
6
ppp
6
prp
6
tgt
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!