Background: Standard linear echoendoscopes have a large distal tip and bending radius, which can preclude adequate examination in some patients.

Objective: We examined the impact of having available slim linear echoendoscopes (SLE) on our endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) practice.

Materials And Methods: As a quality improvement measure, data on the need for the use of SLE were documented in 2000 consecutive procedures performed over a 10-month period from February to November 2022. When examination using a standard size echoendoscope failed due to technical limitations, the procedure was reattempted in the same session using a SLE. The main outcome was the impact of SLE, which was defined as the establishment of a new diagnosis or if findings altered treatment plan.

Results: A complete EUS examination failed in 23 of 2000 procedures (1.15%, 95% CI, 0.73-1.72%) performed using standard size echoendoscope (14 male, median age 73 y [IQR 66 to 79]). The examination was technically successful when using SLE in 22 of 23 (95.6%) patients. SLE impacted clinical management in all 22 patients (100%) by establishing tissue diagnosis in 19 and/or altering subsequent treatment plan in 5. Adverse event of transient hypoxia was observed in one patient (4.3%).

Conclusions: A very experienced EUS team required SLE in 1.1% of consecutive examinations. Our findings suggest that when used, 95% of patients benefitted as it had a significant impact on their clinical management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11305618PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001938DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impact slim
8
slim linear
8
linear echoendoscopes
8
standard size
8
size echoendoscope
8
clinical management
8
sle
7
impact
4
linear echoendoscope
4
echoendoscope practice
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!