Diagnostic Yield of Epilepsy-Genes Sequencing and Chromosomal Microarray in Pediatric Epilepsy.

Pediatr Neurol

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Center for Personalized Medicine, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address:

Published: January 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • About 40% of epilepsy cases have a genetic cause, with EGS showing higher diagnostic success compared to CMA.
  • In a study, only 7.7% of patients tested with CMA found causative variants, while EGS identified 17.6%.
  • EGS is particularly more effective for those with infantile seizure onset and complex symptoms, suggesting it should be the first-choice test for quicker diagnosis.

Article Abstract

Background: Around 40% of individuals with epilepsy have an underlying identifiable genetic etiology. Common methods for epilepsy genetic testing are chromosomal microarray (CMA) and epilepsy-genes sequencing (EGS). Historically, CMA was the first-line test for patients with epilepsy, but recent studies have shown that EGS has a superior diagnostic yield. To further optimize testing algorithms for epilepsy, we compared these tests' diagnostic yields and explored how they are influenced by age of onset and phenotype complexity.

Methods: Genetic test results from a cohort of patients with epilepsy were used to determine the diagnostic yield of CMA (n = 366) versus EGS (n = 370) for genetic epilepsy etiologies. Further analysis examined the probability of diagnostic results based on age of seizure onset and patients' phenotype complexity.

Results: For patients who underwent CMA, causative variants were found in 28 of 366 cases (7.7%), and 60 of 366 patients (16.4%) had at least one variant of uncertain significance (VUS). For EGS, 65 of 370 (17.6%) cases had causative variants, whereas 155 of 370 (41.9%) had at least one VUS. EGS had a significantly higher diagnostic yield than CMA (odds ratio [OR] = 2.63, P < 0.001). This difference in diagnostic yield was further pronounced among patients with infantile seizure onset (OR = 4.69, P < 0.001) and patients with additional neurological findings (OR = 2.99, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: To minimize the time and resources required to reach a diagnosis, clinicians and insurers alike should consider using EGS as an initial diagnostic tool.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.10.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic yield
16
epilepsy-genes sequencing
8
chromosomal microarray
8
patients epilepsy
8
yield cma
8
causative variants
8
vus egs
8
epilepsy
7
diagnostic
6
cma
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!