Introduction: The aim of this work was to evaluate the diagnostic contribution of magnetic resonance imaging and genourob compared to intraoperative arthroscopy. The objective was to implement a protocol based on magnetic resonance imaging and / or genourob.
Materials And Methods: We did a cross-sectional study from July 18, 2016 to July 19, 2017 at the Maltese hospital comparing the results of MRI and GNRB from 30 patients compared to intraoperative arthroscopy data.
Results: Complete break.
Unlabelled: - In MRI, we obtained a sensitivity (Se) of 95.7%, a specificity (Sp) of 85.7%.
Unlabelled: - At the GNRB, we found a Se of 87%, a Sp of 42.9%.
Unlabelled: Partially broken.
Unlabelled: - In MRI we obtained a Se of 85.7%, a Sp of 95.7%.
Unlabelled: - At the GNRB, we found a Se of 42.9%, a Sp of 87%.
Conclusion: MRI is better than GNRB. The GNRB does not improve the results of the MRI. It has no diagnostic contribution in the rupture of the ACL knee. It is a device used by the orthopedists to evaluate knee laxity that does not depend on the ACL alone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!