Small-bore (22- or 23-gauge) needles were used to aspirate 458 lung masses. Sensitivity for the detection of malignancy by this method was 96.6% (312 of 323 patients); accuracy was 98.7%. Surgical confirmation was available for comparison in over half of patients with malignancy. Histologic reclassification of malignancy occurred in only 6.1% of patients, with significant misclassification (misdiagnosis of small cell carcinoma) occurring in only two instances. One hundred thirteen of 117 nonmalignant conditions were properly categorized, with an overall specificity of 96.6%. No major complication occurred. While several recent studies have stressed the advantage of using larger needles, to overcome the limitation of smaller aspiration needles that provide only cytologic material, small-needle aspiration appears to be a safe, reliable, and accurate means for diagnosing lung lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797651DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung lesions
8
lesions cytologic
4
cytologic diagnosis
4
diagnosis fine-needle
4
fine-needle biopsy
4
biopsy small-bore
4
small-bore 22-
4
22- 23-gauge
4
23-gauge needles
4
needles aspirate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!