Assessment of inter-rater reliability of screening tools to identify patients at risk of medication-related problems across the emergency department continuum of care.

Australas Emerg Care

Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Burwood, Victoria, Australia; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address:

Published: June 2024

Background: Following a national multicentre study, two emergency department (ED) screening tools were developed to determine risk of medication-related problems; one for use at ED presentation and another at ED discharge to the community. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability amongst ED health professionals when applying these screening tools to a series of case scenarios.

Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study was undertaken in the ED of a major metropolitan hospital. Twelve case scenarios were developed following ED observation of a range of patients, which were incorporated into a questionnaire and distributed to 50 health professionals. Inter-rater reliabilities of each explanatory variable of the screening tools and overall assessment were calculated using Fleiss' multi-rater kappa.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 15 doctors, 19 nurses and 16 pharmacists. Fleiss' kappa showed an overall inter-rater reliability for the ED presentation tool of 0.83 (95% CI 0.83-0.84), indicating near perfect agreement. Fleiss' kappa for the ED discharge tool was 0.83 (95% CI 0.83-0.85), which also showed near perfect agreement.

Conclusions: The screening tools produced favourable inter-rater reliability amongst ED health professionals. These results have important implications for ensuring consistency of ED decision-making in screening patients at risk of developing medication-related problems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2023.10.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening tools
20
inter-rater reliability
16
medication-related problems
12
health professionals
12
patients risk
8
risk medication-related
8
emergency department
8
reliability health
8
fleiss' kappa
8
tool 083
8

Similar Publications

Background: Breast cancer remains a significant global health challenge, requiring innovative therapeutic strategies. In silico methods, which leverage computational tools, offer a promising pathway for vaccine development. These methods facilitate antigen identification, epitope prediction, immune response modelling, and vaccine optimization, accelerating the design process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose Of Review: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a highly heterogeneous condition with a wide choice of successful treatment options. However, differences between subtypes are poorly understood and it remains unknown which patients will respond to different treatments. This review aims to summarize the current state of the TN field and explore the problem of predicting surgical outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A key component of ecological risk assessments is to develop evidence-based benchmarks to assess potential hazards to various receptors. To ensure that toxicity value development is performed using the best available science, the reliability (or inherent scientific quality) of these studies must be considered. The degree of reliability can be evaluated via critical appraisal tools (CATs), though application of such methods assessing ecotoxicological literature for toxicity value development is not well established compared to human health assessments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Screening for comprehensive social needs in patients with cancer: a narrative review.

JNCI Cancer Spectr

January 2025

Department of Hematology/Oncology, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Background: Patients with cancer who report social needs have worse quality of life, lower healthcare access, and suboptimal health outcomes. However, screening for social needs does not happen systematically and successful screening tools, strategies, and workflows have seldom been described. The downstream effects of screening including resource navigation have also not been well characterized.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Social-ecological factors are highly congruent with social determinants of health (SDOH): Economic Stability; Educational Access/Quality; Healthcare Access/Quality; Neighborhood/Built Environment; and Social/Community Context. In this topical review, the correspondence of social-ecological theory with SDOH and assessment approaches is reviewed. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is used to show how existing tools may facilitate SDOH screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!