Background: Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method (R-NOSES I-F) is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. However, the current literature on this method is limited to case reports, and further investigation into its safety and feasibility is warranted.

Aim: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of R-NOSES I-F for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

Methods: From September 2018 to February 2022, 206 patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer at First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in this retrospective analysis. Of these patients, 22 underwent R-NOSES I-F surgery (R-NOSES I-F group) and 76 underwent conventional robotic-assisted low rectal cancer resection (RLRC group). Clinicopathological data of all patients were collected and analyzed. Postoperative outcomes and prognoses were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.

Results: Patients in the R-NOSES I-F group had a significantly lower visual analog score for pain on postoperative day 1 (1.7 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.6, = 0.003) and shorter postoperative anal venting time (2.7 ± 0.6 3.5 ± 0.7, < 0.001) than those in the RLRC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, tumor size, TNM stage, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, or inflammatory response ( > 0.05). Postoperative anal and urinary functions, as assessed by Wexner, low anterior resection syndrome, and International Prostate Symptom Scale scores, were similar in both groups ( > 0.05). Long-term follow-up revealed no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups ( > 0.05).

Conclusion: R-NOSES I-F is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. It improves pain relief, promotes gastrointestinal function recovery, and helps avoid incision-related complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642453PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

r-noses i-f
24
rectal cancer
20
lower rectal
12
low rectal
12
natural orifice
8
orifice specimen
8
specimen extraction
8
extraction surgery
8
surgery i-type
8
i-type method
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!