Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric parameters of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans using coplanar and noncoplanar beams in patients with bilateral breast cancer/s (BBCs) in terms of organ at risk sparing and target volume coverage. The hypothesis was to test whether VMAT with noncoplanar beams can result in lesser dose delivery to critical organs such as heart and lung, which will result in lesser overall toxicity.
Materials And Methods: Data of nine BBC cases treated at our hospital were retrieved. Computed tomography simulation data of these cases was used to generate noncoplanar VMAT plans and the parameters were compared with standard VMAT coplanar plans. Contouring was done using radiation therapy oncology group guidelines. Forty-five Gray in 25 fractions was planned followed by 10 Gy in five fractions boost in breast conservation cases.
Results: No significant difference in planning target volume (PTV) coverage was found for the right breast/chestwall ( = 0.940), left breast/chestwall ( = 0.872), and in the total PTV ( = 0.929). Noncoplanar beams resulted in better cardiac sparing in terms of D heart. The difference in mean dose was >1 Gy (8.80 ± 0.28 - 7.28 ± 0.33, < 0.001). The D, V and V values for total lung slightly favor noncoplanar beams, although there was no statistically significant difference. The average monitor units (MUs) were similar for coplanar plans (1515 MU) and noncoplanar plans (1455 MU), but the overall treatment time was higher in noncoplanar plans due to more complex setup and beam arrangement. For noncoplanar VMAT plans, the mean conformity index was slightly better although the homogeneity indices were similar.
Conclusion: VMAT plans with noncoplanar beam arrangements had significant dosimetric advantages in terms of sparing of critical organs, that is D of heart doses with almost equivalent lung doses and equally good target coverage. Larger studies with clinical implications need to be considered to validate this data.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642589 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_36_23 | DOI Listing |
J Appl Clin Med Phys
November 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Background: Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignancy and remain a substantial source of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used and is frequently delivered by hypo-fractionnated volumetric modulated arc therapy using non-coplanar beams, where geometric accuracy and planning margins are a major concern.
Purpose: To give a practical analysis of intrafraction patient motion for multi-target, single isocentre, brain SRS treatments and to derive adapted GTV-to-PTV margins.
Cureus
August 2024
Department of Radiology, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, JPN.
Introduction In linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) leveraging a multileaf collimator (MLC) for brain metastasis (BM), volumetric-modulated arcs (VMAs) enable the generation of a suitable dose distribution with efficient planning and delivery. However, the arc arrangement, including the number of arcs, allocation, and rotation ranges, varies substantially among devices and facilities. Some modalities allow coplanar arc(s) (CA(s)) or beam(s) alone, and some facilities only use them intentionally despite the availability of non-coplanar arcs (NCAs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Appl Clin Med Phys
December 2024
Medical Physics Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for setup and intra-fraction motion control in frameless non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) using actual patient data immobilized with two different types of open-faced masks and employing a novel SGRT systems settings.
Methods And Materials: Forty-four SRS patients were immobilized with two types of open-faced masks. Sixty lesions were treated, involving the analysis of 68 cone-beam scans (CBCT), 157 megavoltage (MV) images, and 521 SGRT monitoring sessions.
Med Dosim
September 2024
Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
C-arm linacs have been used widely to treat multiple cranial metastases using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A new generation of O-ring linacs offer several workflow advantages when compared to C-arm platforms. However, O-ring linacs are not able to employ couch rotations for noncoplanar beams used in SRS treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Radiat Oncol
September 2024
Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Institut für Radionkologie und Strahlentherapie, Darmstadt, Germany.
Purpose: Noncoplanar beams and arcs are routinely used to improve dosimetry for intracranial cases, but their application for extracranial cases has been hampered by the risk of collision. This has led to conservative beam selection whose impact on plan dosimetry has not been previously studied.
Methods And Materials: A full-body 3-dimensional patient surface was acquired using optical cameras for a single lung patient at the time of computed tomography simulation.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!