All new physical behaviour measurement devices should be assessed for compatibility with previous devices. Agreement was assessed between the activPAL4 and activPAL3 physical behavior monitors within a laboratory and a multi-day free-living context. Healthy children aged 6-12 years performed standardised (sitting, standing, stepping) (12 min) and non-standardised (6 min) activities in a laboratory and a multi-day (median 3 days) free-living assessment whilst wearing both monitors. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, sensitivity, and the positive predictive value (PPV). There were 15 children (7M/8F, 8.4 ± 1.8 years old) recruited. For the laboratory-based standardised activities, sitting time, stepping time, and fast walking/jogging step count were all within ±5% agreement. However, the activPAL4 standing time was lower (-6.4%) and normal speed walking step count higher (+7.8%) than those of the activPAL3. For non-standardised activities, a higher step count was recorded by the activPAL4 (+4.9%). The standardised activity sensitivity and PPV were all >90%, but the non-standardised activity values were lower. For free-living agreement, the standing time was lower (-7.6%) and step count higher (all steps + 2.2%, steps with cadence >100 step/min + 6.6%) for the activPAL4 than the activPAL3. This study highlights differences in outcomes as determined by the activPAL4 and activPAL3, which should be considered when comparing outcomes between studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10648043PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23218970DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

step count
16
activpal4 activpal3
12
physical behaviour
8
children aged
8
aged 6-12
8
6-12 years
8
agreement assessed
8
laboratory multi-day
8
standing time
8
time lower
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!