Thermal Power Plant generates FGD gypsum as by-product during coal combustion. This study evaluates the characterization (spectroscopic and elemental), potentially toxic elements (PTEs) distribution, and environmental risk assessment of FGD gypsum for safe and sustainable use in agriculture. The XRD and SEM analysis confirmed the dominance of crystalline CaSO·2HO in FGD gypsum. The order of concentrations of PTEs in FGD gypsum was Fe > Al > Mn > Zn > Ni > Co. The residual fraction was the dominant pool, sharing 80-90% of the total PTEs. The heavy metals (HMs) were below the toxic range in the leachates. The Co, Ni, Al, Fe Mn, Zn had low (< 10%) risk assessment code and the ecotoxicity was in the range of 0.0-7.46%. The contamination factor was also low (0.0-0.16) at the normal recommended doses of FGD gypsum application for sodicity reclamation. The enrichment factor was in the order of Al < Mn < Co < Zn < Ni. Mn [enrichment factor (E) 1.2-2.0] and Co (E 1.7-2.8) showed negligible enrichment of metals, whereas Ni (E 4.3-5.2) and Zn (E 4.5-5.6) reported moderate accumulation in soil. The application of FGD gypsum @ 10 t ha for sodicity reclamation will develop a geo-accumulation index below the critical values indicating its safe and sustainable use to achieve land degradation neutrality (LDN) and UN's Sustainable Development Goals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643664PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45706-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fgd gypsum
20
toxic elements
8
fgd
5
gypsum
5
characterization flue
4
flue gas
4
gas desulphurized
4
desulphurized fgd
4
gypsum coal-fired
4
coal-fired plant
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!