A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endoscopic management of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery in a Moroccan center: A case series and literature review. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Endoscopic management is being explored as an effective alternative to revision surgery for treating colorectal fistulas, particularly in patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage following colorectal cancer procedures.
  • A study involving eight patients showed a primary success rate of 50% overall, with factors like the size of the fistula and its distance from the anal margin impacting the treatment's effectiveness.
  • The use of metallic clips proved beneficial, achieving a 100% success rate for patients with fistula ostia ≤1 cm, highlighting the potential for endoscopy as a secure treatment option.

Article Abstract

Endoscopic management has become an alternate treatment to a revision surgery for colorectal fistulas. Eight patients who were treated by endoscopy for postoperative anastomotic leakage to colorectal cancer were included. A univariate analysis was carried out to determine the predictive factors of success. All our patients were treated using metallic clips. The primary efficiency of this technique was 50%. In a univariate analysis, the size of the fistula and its distance from the anal margin had an influence on the efficiency of the endoscopic treatment, which was not the case for either the surgical technique or the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy. This endoscopic treatment is effective and represents a more secure alternative than revision surgery. In our study, the use of metallic clips showed a 50% success rate, going up to 100% for the group of patients with a fistula ostium of a size ⩽1 cm, proving the necessity of using this technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637152PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050313X231205716DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endoscopic management
8
anastomotic leakage
8
leakage colorectal
8
colorectal cancer
8
revision surgery
8
patients treated
8
univariate analysis
8
metallic clips
8
endoscopic treatment
8
endoscopic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!