AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the potential negative impact of shared decision making (SDM) on patients with incurable cancer, focusing on outcomes like anxiety and hopelessness.
  • Analyzing data from 194 patients and 31 oncologists, the research found that increased SDM in consultations was linked to higher levels of tension and decisional uncertainty.
  • The specific SDM element of informing patients about their options was notably associated with feelings of helplessness and tension, indicating the need for oncologists to be cautious about how they implement SDM, despite no long-term adverse effects being observed.

Article Abstract

Background: While shared decision making (SDM) is advocated for ethical reasons and beneficial outcomes, SDM might also negatively affect patients with incurable cancer. The current study explored whether SDM, and an oncologist training in SDM, are associated with adverse outcomes (i.e., patient anxiety, tension, helplessness/hopelessness, decisional uncertainty, and reduced fighting spirit).

Design: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial investigating the effects of SDM interventions in the context of advanced cancer. The relations between observed SDM (OPTION12), specific SDM elements (4SDM), oncologist SDM training, and adverse outcomes were analyzed. We modeled adverse outcomes as a multivariate phenomenon, followed by univariate regressions if significant.

Results: In total, 194 patients consulted by 31 oncologists were included. In a multivariate analysis, observed SDM and adverse outcomes were significantly related. More specifically, more observed SDM in the consultation was related to patients reporting more tension ( = 0.002) and more decisional uncertainty ( = 0.004) at 1 wk after the consultation. The SDM element "informing about the options" was especially found to be related to adverse outcomes, specifically to more helplessness/hopelessness ( = 0.002) and more tension ( = 0.016) at 1 wk after the consultation. Whether the patient consulted an oncologist who had received SDM training or not was not significantly related to adverse outcomes. No relations with long-term adverse outcomes were found.

Conclusions: It is important for oncologists to realize that for some patients, SDM may temporarily be associated with negative emotions. Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and whether and how burden may be minimized for patients.

Highlights: Observed shared decision making was related to more tension and uncertainty postconsultation in advanced cancer patientsHowever, training oncologists in SDM did not affect adverse outcomes.Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and how burden may be minimized.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712204PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231208448DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse outcomes
40
sdm
14
shared decision
12
decision making
12
observed sdm
12
outcomes
11
adverse
10
secondary analysis
8
analysis randomized
8
decisional uncertainty
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!