Background: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers.
Methods: This qualitative study involved a needs assessment via individual interviews. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers from across Canada who counsel patients considering EF. 25 participants were included (13 providers and 12 patients). The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Interviews were transcribed, and transcripts analyzed for themes and concepts using NVIVO 12.
Findings: Multiple factors contributing to decisional difficulty were identified, including: (1) multiple reproductive options available with differing views from patients/providers regarding their importance; (2) a decision typically made under the pressure of reproductive aging; (3) uncertainty surrounding the technology/inadequate outcome data; (4) the financial burden of EF; (5) inherent uncertainty relating to potential decision regret; and (6) differing perceptions between patients/providers regarding the role providers should play in the decision. Additionally, potential sources of decisional support were identified, including provision of basic information before and/or during initial consultation, followed by an opportunity during or after initial consultation for clarifying information and helping with value judgements. Individualized counselling based on patient values, adequate follow-up, psychosocial counselling, and peer support were also emphasized.
Conclusions: More decisional support for women considering EF is needed. Suggestions include a patient decision aid in conjunction with modified healthcare provider counselling, support and follow up.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641979 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Effectiveness of shared decision making strategies for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation: cluster randomized controlled trial.
BMJ
January 2025
Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City VA Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of multiple decision aid strategies in promoting high quality shared decision making for prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Six academic medical centers in the United States.
Background: Older adults from minority groups often experience elevated rates of chronic diseases and cognitive impairment, coupled with lower rates of engagement in advance care planning (ACP) and comfort care as they approach end of life. The complexities of ACP and end-of-life care become particularly pronounced in older adults with cognitive impairment. As cognitive and decisional capacity changes, healthcare decisions are commonly delegated to family members or proxies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: National and international organizations, including the United Nations, Center for Disease Control, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the US Surgeon General's Office have highlighted the need for a comprehensive approach to caring for the growing number of older adults in the U.S. Furthermore, advancements in both non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), coupled with the CMS initiative on improving dementia care management (GUIDE), have intensified national attention on the needs of older adults living with ADRD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDementia Care Research and Psychosocial Factors.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Background: People living with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias confront numerous decisions that affect their wellbeing, as well as that of their family members. Research demonstrates the importance of family involvement in such decision making, yet there is a lack of knowledge about how patients and families work together to make decisions and how families can best provide decisional support.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted separately with 15 patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia, identified through a National Institute on Aging-funded Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, and 14 care partners.
Understanding Reactions to Informative Process Model Interventions: Ambivalence as a Mechanism of Change.
Behav Sci (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3103301, Israel.
Transforming the course of protracted and bloody conflicts requires changing the behaviors and minds of society members who take part in these conflicts. While studies examining the psychology of such societies point to the barriers that conflict-supporting narratives create for changing minds and behavior, a novel psychological intervention offers a new direction to facilitate openness for attitude change based on the Information Process Model (IPM). Previous studies indicated the effectiveness of this intervention in creating an unfreezing of conflict attitudes and increasing support for peace negotiation in different conflict areas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!