Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Cleft Lip and/or Palate (CLP) are the most common congenital orofacial anomalies. Those involved in CLP care may extend beyond the core members of the Cleft multidisciplinary team (MDT) with a variety of medical healthcare professionals destined to contribute to the management of CLP patients at some point during their respective careers. Therefore, it seems essential that a basic understanding of CLP, CLP-associated problems, and potential avenues for direct or indirect involvement in CLP care be introduced at undergraduate level.
Aims: To investigate penultimate and final year undergraduate medical student CLP knowledge and exposure obtained whilst at medical school.
Methodology: An online questionnaire was distributed to penultimate and final year medical students throughout the UK.
Results: A total of 3102 responses were received from 35 medical schools. 44.3% (n = 1374) of respondents had no exposure to CLP teaching up until their current year of education. 61.3% (n = 1903) of respondents had never been involved in the care of a CLP patient. 53.6% (n = 1662) of respondents were not confident in their current knowledge of CLP. 78.5% (n = 2257) of respondents indicated a desire to be involved in the care of CLP patients in their future career.
Conclusion: More than half of the medical student survey respondents were not confident in their current knowledge of CLP and had limited involvement in CLP care. This may translate to a delay in diagnosis when students qualify. Improving CLP education and exposure during undergraduate training can help achieve national CLP standards for early diagnosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10556656231211422 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!