Mechanical evaluation of revision surgery for femoral shaft nonunion initially treated with intramedullary nailing: Exchange nailing versus augmentation plating.

Introduction: Exchange nailing (EN) or augmentation plating (AP) has been employed to treat nonunions after intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures. Although instability is a factor in hypertrophic nonunion, mechanical evaluations have been limited because the contribution of the callus to fracture site stability varies with healing. Our previous study illustrated the potential for evaluation using a finite element analysis (FEA) that incorporates callus material properties. This study aimed to mechanically evaluate revision surgery for nonunions using FEA.

Materials And Methods: A quantitative computed tomography-based FEA was performed on virtual revision models of a patient with suspected nonunion after intramedullary nailing. In addition to the initial nailing model (IN) with an 11-mm diameter (D) and 360-mm length (L), four EN models with D12mm (EN1), D13mm (EN2), D12mm-L400mm (EN3), and D13mm-L400mm (EN4) nails and three AP models with 5- (AP1), 6- (AP2), and 7-hole (AP3) plates were created. As with bone, callus was assigned inhomogeneous material properties derived from density based on an empirical formula. The hip joint reaction force and muscle forces at maximum load during the gait cycle were applied. The volume ratio of the callus at the fracture site with a tensile failure risk of ≥1 (tensile failure ratio) and bone fragment movement were evaluated.

Results: The tensile failure ratio was 11.6 % (IN), 10.1 % (EN1), 6.3 % (EN2), 10.9 % (EN3), 6.2 % (EN4), 6.4 % (AP1), 7.2 % (AP2), and 7.7 % (AP3), respectively. The bone fragment movement showed an opening on the lateral side with the initial intramedullary nailing. However, both revision surgeries reduced the opening, leading to compression except in the EN1 model. The proximal bone fragments were internally rotated relative to the distal fragments, and the rotational instability was more suppressed in models with lower tensile failure ratio.

Conclusions: For EN, the increase in diameter, not length, is important to suppress instability. AP reduces instability, comparable to a 2 mm increase in nail diameter, and screw fixation closer to the fracture site reduces instability. This study suggest that AP is mechanically equivalent to EN and could be an option for revision surgery for femoral shaft nonunions.