The Medicare Care Choices Model (MCCM) tested a new option for eligible Medicare beneficiaries to receive conventional treatment for terminal conditions along with supportive and palliative care from participating hospice providers. Using claims data, we estimated differences in average outcomes from enrollment to death between deceased MCCM enrollees and matched comparison beneficiaries who received usual services covered by original Medicare. Enrollees were 15 percentage points less likely to receive an aggressive life-prolonging treatment at the end of life and spent more than five more days at home. MCCM also reduced net Medicare expenditures by 13 percent, decreased inpatient admissions by 26 percent, reduced outpatient emergency department visits by 12 percent, and increased hospice use by 18 percentage points. Although the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services did not expand the model, given concerns about generalizability, these results provide evidence that MCCM is a promising approach to transforming care delivery at the end of life.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00465DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medicare care
8
care choices
8
choices model
8
medicare expenditures
8
increased hospice
8
medicare
7
model improved
4
improved end-of-life
4
care
4
end-of-life care
4

Similar Publications

National analysis of health-related social needs among adult injury survivors.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

January 2025

From the Department of Surgery (A.H.H., N.M.C., B.T.S.), Division of Trauma, Burn, and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (E.B., D.N., B.T.S., A.M., E.M.B., J.W.S.), and Department of Health Metrics Sciences (J.L.D., J.W.S.), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington; Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (D.Z.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

Background: Despite advances in trauma care, the effects of social determinants of health continue to be a barrier to optimal health outcomes. Health-related social needs (HRSNs), now the basis of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services national screening program, may contribute to poor health outcomes, inequities, and low-value care, but the impact of HRSNs among injured patients remains poorly understood at the national level.

Methods: Using data from the nationally representative 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, injured patients were matched with uninjured controls via coarsened exact matching on age and sex.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although existing work has evaluated outcomes associated with care fragmentation (CF), these adverse consequences may be accentuated in patients undergoing bariatric operations. This retrospective study examined the association of CF with clinical and financial outcomes among patients receiving bariatric surgery.

Methods: All adult (≥18 years) records for bariatric operations were tabulated from the 2016-2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Despite its high cost-effectiveness, radiation oncology faces the greatest prior authorization (PA) burden of any medical specialty. Insurance denials and resulting treatment delays have been documented across several treatment modalities, including stereotactic body radiation, intensity modulated radiation, and proton therapy. Although insurance companies suggest that PA is intended to control health care spending and ensure the implementation of evidence-based practice, the number of radiation treatment plans reviewed by the PA process that result in changes is quite low.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship can be challenging due to disparities in resource allocation across the care continuum, competing priorities for ambulatory prescribers, ineffective communication strategies, and lack of incentive to prioritize antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) initiatives. Efforts to monitor and compare outpatient antibiotic usage metrics have been implemented through quality measures (QM). Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS®) represent standardized measures that examine the quality of antibiotic prescribing by region and across insurance health plans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: In the United States, there are disparities in access to care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on the basis of socioeconomic and racial/ethnic factors. This study investigates the association between race/ethnicity and the utilization of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy among older patients with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC).

Methods: This retrospective study used data from the SEER-Medicare-linked database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!