A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Tumor treating fields increases blood-brain barrier permeability and relative cerebral blood volume in patients with glioblastoma. | LitMetric

Background And Objective: 200 kHz tumor treating fields (TTFields) is clinically approved for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). Because its effects on conventional surveillance MRI brain scans are equivocal, we investigated its effects on perfusion MRI (pMRI) brain scans.

Methods: Each patient underwent institutional standard pMRI: dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) pMRI at three time points: baseline, 2-, and 6-months on-adjuvant therapy. At each timepoint, the difference between T1 pre- versus post-contrast tumor volume (ΔT1) and these pMRI metrics were evaluated: normalized and standardized relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV, sRCBV); fractional plasma volume (V), volume of extravascular extracellular space (EES) per volume of tissue (V), blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability (K), and time constant for gadolinium reflux from EES back into the vascular system (K). Between-group comparisons were performed using rank-sum analysis, and bootstrapping evaluated likely reproducibility of the results.

Results: Among 13 pMRI datasets (11 nGBM, 2 recurrent GBM), therapies included temozolomide-only ( = 9) and temozolomide + TTFields ( = 4). No significant differences were found in patient or tumor characteristics. Compared to temozolomide-only, temozolomide + TTFields did not significantly affect the percent-change in pMRI metrics from baseline to 2 months. But during the 2- to 6-month period, temozolomide + TTFields significantly increased the percent-change in nRCBV (+26.9% [interquartile range 55.1%] vs -39.1% [37.0%], = 0.049), sRCBV (+9.5% [39.7%] vs -30.5% [39.4%], = 0.049), K (+54.6% [1768.4%] vs -26.9% [61.2%], = 0.024), V (+111.0% [518.1%] vs -13.0% [22.5%], = 0.048), and V (+98.8% [2172.4%] vs -24.6% [53.3%], = 0.024) compared to temozolomide-only.

Conclusion: Using pMRI, we provide initial in-human validation of pre-clinical studies regarding the effects of TTFields on tumor blood volume and BBB permeability in GBM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10863570PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19714009231207083DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood volume
12
temozolomide ttfields
12
tumor treating
8
treating fields
8
blood-brain barrier
8
relative cerebral
8
cerebral blood
8
pmri metrics
8
bbb permeability
8
temozolomide-only temozolomide
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!