AI Article Synopsis

  • The study used an intersectional framework to explore how various identities (gender, race, caregiver status, etc.) influenced academic faculty's experiences during COVID-19.
  • Faculty with multiple intersectional identities reported higher levels of depression, work-family conflict, and stress, along with increased workloads and lower productivity compared to those with fewer intersecting identities.
  • The findings highlight significant disparities and can help shape future strategies in addressing faculty well-being, promotion, and retention issues in academia.

Article Abstract

The aim of this study was to utilize an intersectional framework to examine academic faculty's lived experiences during COVID-19. Specifically, we set out to: (1) describe the multiple intersectional identities (, gender, race/ethnicity, rank, caregiver status, disability status) represented by the faculty, (2) examine potential disparities in well-being, workload, and productivity linked to these intersectional factors, and (3) identify qualitative themes endorsed by faculty as they relate to lived experiences during COVID-19. This was a cross-sectional mixed-methods research study. The Center for Women in Medicine and Science (CWIMS) at the University of Minnesota developed and implemented a survey between February-June of 2021 in response to national reports of disparities in the impacts of COVID-19 on faculty with lived experiences from multiple intersections. There were 291 full-time faculty who participated in the study. Quantitative findings indicated that faculty with multiple intersectional identities (, woman+assistant professor+caregiver+underrepresented in medicine) reported greater depression symptoms, work/family conflict, and stress in contrast to faculty with fewer intersectional identities. Furthermore, faculty with more intersectional identities reported higher clinical workloads and service responsibilities and lower productivity with regard to research article submissions, publications, and grant submissions in contrast to faculty with fewer intersectional identities. Qualitative findings supported quantitative findings and broadened understanding of potential underlying reasons. Findings confirm anecdotal evidence that faculty with lived experiences from multiple intersections may be disproportionately experiencing negative outcomes from the pandemic. These findings can inform decisions about how to address these disparities moving into the next several years with regard to promotion and tenure, burnout and well-being, and faculty retention in academic medical settings. Given these findings, it is also important to intentionally plan responses for future public health crises to prevent continued disparities for faculty with multiple intersectional identities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457843PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0045DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intersectional identities
24
lived experiences
20
multiple intersectional
12
faculty
11
faculty's lived
8
well-being workload
8
workload productivity
8
intersectional
8
experiences covid-19
8
faculty lived
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!