AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores the effectiveness of major ozonated autohemotherapy (MOAH) as a treatment for critically ill COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation.
  • Patients receiving MOAH in addition to standard care experienced more days without needing ventilation and had a shorter stay in the intensive care unit compared to those who only received standard treatment.
  • The findings suggest that MOAH may improve clinical outcomes for severe COVID-19 patients needing intensive care.

Article Abstract

Until the availability of an effective and practical vaccine, there is a serious need to recognize alternative treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to determine whether major ozonated autohemotherapy (MOAH) can improve the clinical and paraclinical parameters in critically-ill patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. In this controlled trial, we enrolled 40 critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. The enrolled patients were then randomized into the MOAH and control groups. The patients in the MOAH group received MOAH three times per week (10 times in total) in addition to routine treatment and standard critical supportive care. Patients in the control group were only given regular treatment and standard critical supportive care. The patients in the MOAH group had more days of breathing with no aid than those in the control group. Moreover, the length of stay in the intensive-care unit was significantly lower in the MOAH group than in the control group. MOAH resulted in higher ventilation-free days and less intensive-care unit stay compared with the control treatment. In COVID-19 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, MOAH with routine treatment resulted in more ventilator-free days and less intensive-care unit stay compared with the standard therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715328PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.385439DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

routine treatment
12
covid-19 patients
12
mechanical ventilation
12
moah group
12
control group
12
intensive-care unit
12
clinical paraclinical
8
patients
8
controlled trial
8
moah
8

Similar Publications

Prognostic Value of Myocardial CT-ECV in Severe Aortic Stenosis Requiring Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging

January 2025

Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Aim: Computed tomography (CT)-derived extracellular volume fraction (ECV) is a non-invasive method to quantify myocardial fibrosis. Evaluating CT-ECV during aortic valve replacement (AVR) planning CT in severe aortic stenosis (AS) may aid prognostic stratification. This meta-analysis evaluated the prognostic significance of CT-ECV in severe AS necessitating AVR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Evaluate the effect of white noise intervention on sleep quality and immunological indicators of patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods: From January 2020 to December 2022, 104 newly diagnosed female patients (the number of people who met the inclusion criteria) with breast cancer who were confirmed to be preoperative NAC by puncture pathology were selected for a randomised single-blind trial. The patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 52 cases in each group.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Households are a significant source of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, even during periods of low community-level spread. Comparing household transmission rates by SARS-CoV-2 variant may provide relevant information about current risks and prevention strategies. This investigation aimed to estimate differences in household transmission risk comparing the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants using data from contact tracing and interviews conducted from November 2021 through February 2022 in five U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In recent years, cancer survival rates have increased exponentially. However, this rise in survival comes with a significant drawback. As the number of treatment lines has grown, so too have the side effects, which can severely impact patients' functionality and quality of life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Although sharing care with local oncologists after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been proposed for patients living far from HCT centers, it is not known whether a shared strategy is safe or improves patient quality of life (QOL).

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of sharing follow-up care after HCT between the HCT specialty center and local oncologists.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This was a multicenter collaborative randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing HCT at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI)-a high volume HCT center in Boston (Massachusetts)-and 8 local oncology practices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!