This study was dedicated to introducing a new method for predicting the Sauter mean diameter (SMD) buildup in the swirl cup airblast fuel injector. There have been considerable difficulties with predicting SMD mainly because of complicated flow characteristics in a spray. Therefore, the backpropagation (BP) neural network-based machine learning was applied for the prediction of SMD as a function of geometry, condition parameters, and axial distance such as primary swirl number, secondary swirl number, venturi angle, mass flow rate of fuel, and relative air pressure. SMD was measured by a phase Doppler particle analyzer (PDPA). The results show that the prediction accuracy of the trained BP neural network was excellent with a coefficient of determination () score of 0.9599, root mean square error (RMSE) score of 1.4613, and overall relative error within 20%. Through sensitivity analysis, the relative air pressure drop and primary swirl number were the largest and smallest factors affecting the value of SMD, respectively. Finally, the prediction accuracy of the BP neural network model is far greater than the current prediction correlations. Moreover, for the predicting target in the present study, the BP neural network shows the advantages of a simple structure and short running time compared with PSO-BP and GRNN. All these prove that the BP neural network is a novel and effective way to predict the SMD of droplets generated by a swirl cup airblast fuel injector.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10620779 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03232 | DOI Listing |
Soft comput
September 2024
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Hunan University of Information Technology, Changsha, 410151 Hunan China.
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-08073-4.].
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSoft comput
October 2024
Centre for Healthcare advancements, Innovation and Research, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai Campus, Chennai, India.
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07122-8.].
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSoft comput
August 2024
Laboratory of Big Data and Applied Analytical Methods - Big MAAp, Mackenzie Presbiterian University, São Paulo, Brazil.
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1007/s00500-021-05810-5.].
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSoft comput
July 2024
Department of International Communication and Culture and Art, Hebei Professional College of Political Science and Law, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050061 China.
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-08123-x.].
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
January 2025
Renewable Energy Science and Engineering Department, Faculty of Postgraduate Studies for Advanced Sciences (PSAS), Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models for predicting Wind Turbine (WT) power output based on environmental variables such as temperature, humidity, wind speed, and wind direction. Along with Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), the following ML models were looked at: Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM). Using a dataset of 40,000 observations, the models were assessed based on R-squared, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!