Background: Infection (CDI) is a healthcare-associated diarrheal disease prevalent worldwide. A common diagnostic algorithm relies on a two-step protocol that employs stool enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) to detect the pathogen, and its toxins, respectively. Active CDI is deemed less likely when the Toxin EIA result is negative, even if the pathogen-specific EIA is positive for We recently reported, however, that low-toxin-producing strains recovered from Toxin-negative ('discrepant') clinical stool specimens can be fully pathogenic, and cause lethality in a rodent CDI model. To document frequency of discrepant CDI specimens, and evaluate strain diversity, we performed longitudinal surveillance at a Southern Arizona tertiary-care hospital.

Methods: Diarrheic stool specimens from patients with clinical suspicion of CDI were obtained over an eight-year period (2015-2022) from all inpatient and outpatient Units of a > 600-bed Medical Center in Southern Arizona. Clinical laboratory EIA testing identified -containing specimens, and classified them as Toxin-positive or Toxin-negative. isolates recovered from the stool specimens were DNA fingerprinted using an international phylogenetic lineage assignment system ("ribotyping"). For select isolates, toxin abundance in stationary phase supernatants of pure cultures was quantified via EIA.

Results: Of 8,910 diarrheic specimens that underwent diagnostic testing, 1733 (19.4%) harbored . Our major findings were that: (1) prevalence and phylogenetic diversity was stable over the 8-year period; (2) toxigenic was recovered from 69% of clinically Tox-neg ('discrepant') specimens; (3) the six most prevalent USA ribotypes were recovered in significant proportions (>60%) from Tox-neg specimens; and (4) toxin-producing recovered from discrepant specimens produced less toxin than strains of the same ribotype isolated from non-discrepant specimens.

Conclusion: Our study highlights the dominance of Toxin EIA-negative CDI specimens in a clinical setting and the high frequency of known virulent ribotypes in these specimens. Therefore, a careful reevaluation of the clinical relevance of diagnostically-discrepant specimens particularly in the context of missed CDI diagnoses and persistence, is warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10622765PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1238159DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

specimens
13
stool specimens
12
longitudinal surveillance
8
cdi specimens
8
southern arizona
8
cdi
7
clinical
6
recovered
5
prevalence diagnostically-discrepant
4
diagnostically-discrepant clinical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!