Background: Risk prediction of anastomotic leakage using anatomical and vascular factors has not been well established. This study aimed to assess the anatomical and vascular factors affecting the hemodynamics of the gastric conduit and develop a novel risk stratification system in patients undergoing esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 202 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent subtotal esophagectomy with gastric tube retrosternal reconstruction between January 2008 and December 2020. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL), including the anatomical index (AI) and anastomotic viability index (AVI), were evaluated using a logistic regression model.

Results: According to the logistic regression model, the independent risk factors for AL were preoperative body mass index ≥23.6 kg/m (odds ratio [OR], 7.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.44-26.00;  0.01), AI <1.4 (OR, 23.90; 95% CI, 5.02-114.00;  0.01), and AVI <0.62 (OR, 8.02; 95% CI, 2.57-25.00;  0.01). The patients were stratified into four AL risk groups using AI and AVI as follows: low-risk group (AI ≥1.4, AVI ≥0.62 [2/99, 2.0%]), intermediate low-risk group (AI ≥1.4, AVI <0.62 [2/29, 6.9%]), intermediate high-risk group (AI <1.4, AVI ≥0.62 [8/53, 15.1%]), and high-risk group (AI <1.4, AVI <0.62 [11/21, 52.4%]).

Conclusion: The combination of AI and AVI strongly predicted AL. Additionally, the use of AI and AVI enabled the stratification of the risk of AL in patients who underwent esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623953PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12693DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anastomotic leakage
12
anatomical anastomotic
8
anastomotic viability
8
esophagectomy retrosternal
8
retrosternal reconstruction
8
anatomical vascular
8
vascular factors
8
risk factors
8
logistic regression
8
risk
5

Similar Publications

Introduction: Unplanned, delayed readmissions (>30 ds) following oncologic surgeries can increase mortality and care costs and affect hospital quality indices. However, there is a dearth of literature on rectal cancer surgery. Hence, we aimed to assess the risk factors associated with delayed readmissions following rectal cancer surgery to improve targeted interventions, patient outcomes, and quality indices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Short-term outcomes of low anterior resection with and without ileostomy for low, mid and upper rectal cancers.

Updates Surg

January 2025

The Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 W 3Rd St, Suite 880, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.

Although the addition of an ileostomy to low anterior resection (LAR) may often be considered preventative of anastomotic leakage (AL), evidence that clearly demonstrates such benefit is lacking. This study aimed to identify the impact of adding an ileostomy upon AL and organ-space surgical site infection (SSI) rates in patients with lower, middle, or upper rectal cancer. This case-control study included rectal cancer patients who had undergone elective LAR in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset between 2016 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In China, the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer are increasing, in which low rectal cancer is more common. Ultra-low rectal cancer refers to rectal cancer where the distance between the tumor and the anus is less than 5 cm, it accounts for about 70%-80% of rectal tumors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!