AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study focused on understanding the decision-making experiences of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their caregivers, using qualitative interviews to gather insights.
  • - The analysis revealed three main themes: decisions often arise due to health decline, challenges include lack of information and complex health conditions, and certain factors like supportive caregivers can alleviate these challenges.
  • - The conclusion suggests that interventions should empower patients and caregivers to actively seek information and participate in their healthcare decisions before reaching advanced illness stages.

Article Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the decision-making experience of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their caregivers.

Methods: This was a qualitative descriptive study of the decision-making experiences of individuals with stage 3-end-stage CKD and their family caregivers. One-on-one, semistructured interviews were conducted using a guide developed and approved by a community advisory group. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were identified: (1) decisions triggered by declining health and broad in scope, (2) challenges to decision-making and (3) factors influencing decision-making. Participants' experiences with health-related decision-making demonstrated that decisions were triggered when health declined. Yet, decisions that impact disease progression were being made in stage 3. Decision-making was made difficult due to lack of information, complex co-morbidities, and poor resource utilization. However, the structure and nature of the medical appointment, supportive caregivers, and resources served to remove challenges.

Conclusion: Decision-support interventions must train patients and caregivers to be empowered participants in answer-seeking behaviours upstream of advanced illness.

Public Contributions: This work was conducted in full collaboration with a community advisory board consisting of patients with CKD, caregivers and clinicians. These members are noted in the acknowledgement section, and those who worked with the team to develop the interview guide, study protocols, and manuscript preparation are included as authors. As part of their role, advisory members met monthly, providing input on recruitment, study progress, inclusion of diverse voices and added relevance to study findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10757106PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13907DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health-related decision-making
8
decision-making experiences
8
chronic kidney
8
kidney disease
8
community advisory
8
decisions triggered
8
decision-making
7
study
6
caregivers
5
exploring health-related
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Cutaneous chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is independently associated with morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. However, the health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) domains that are most important to patients are poorly understood.

Objective: To perform a concept elicitation study to define HRQOL in cutaneous chronic GVHD from the patient perspective and to compare experiences of patients with epidermal vs sclerotic disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To assess the validity of time trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG) techniques of utility valuation among patients with periodontal problems by assessing their relation to two logical constructs; Gingival Index (GI) and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) Questionnaire.

Materials And Methods: Two hundred and one patients aged 18 years old and above, who visited a tertiary care hospital for treatment/consultation were included. A questionnaire was administered to record the TTO, SG, and OHIP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Machine learning in healthcare citizen science: A scoping review.

Int J Med Inform

December 2024

Biomedical Informatics Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC 29425, USA. Electronic address:

Objectives: This scoping review aims to clarify the definition and trajectory of citizen-led scientific research (so-called citizen science) within the healthcare domain, examine the degree of integration of machine learning (ML) and the participation levels of citizen scientists in health-related projects.

Materials And Methods: In January and September 2024 we conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost platform for peer-reviewed publications that combine citizen science and machine learning (ML) in healthcare. Articles were excluded if citizens were merely passive data providers or if only professional scientists were involved.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Addressing the effects of non-compliance with health-related recommendations in pandemics is needed for informed decision-making. This longitudinal study investigated the effects of non-compliance on mental health and academic self-efficacy among university students in Sweden.

Methods: Baseline assessments were conducted in May 2020, with follow-ups after 5 and 10 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aimed to identify a preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure that best reflects disease-specific features in patients with neck pain by comparing the characteristics of the instruments.

Design: Pooled data from three multicentre randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) on neck pain were included for analysis in this study.

Setting: All three RCTs were conducted between 2017 and 2020 in Korea, and patients were recruited from four hospitals and one university teaching hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!