Dosimetric comparison of free-breathing versus respiratory motion-managed radiotherapy via four-dimensional computed tomography-based volumetric-modulated arctherapy for lung cancer.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to use respiratory motion-managed radiotherapy (RT) to reduce side effects and to compare dosimetric factors with free-breathing planning in patients with lung cancer.

Materials And Methods: Simulation images were obtained in 10 respiratory phases with free breathing using four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scanner. Planning target volume (PTV) was created with 5mm margins in each direction of the internal target volume delineated using the maximum intensity projection. A volumetric arc treatment (VMAT) plan was created so that the prescribed dose would cover 98% of the PTV. Target volumes for the free-breathing VMAT plan were created according to ICRU Reports 62 and the same prescribed dose was used.

Results: Patients were evaluated during January 2020. Median 63Gy (59.4-64) RT was administered. Median PTV volumes were 173.53 and 494.50cm (P=0.008) and dose covering 95% of PTV volume was 62.97 and 60.51Gy (P=0.13) in 4D-CT based and free-breathing VMAT plans, respectively. The mean and V50 heart dose was 6.03Gy (vs. 10.36Gy, P=0.043) and 8.2% (vs. 33.9%, P=0.007), and significantly lower in 4D-CT based VMAT plans and there was also found a non-significant reduction for other risky organ doses.

Conclusion: Ten patients treated with respiratory motion-managed RT with 4D-CT based VMAT technique. It was observed that PTV did not increase, the target was covered with 95% accuracy, and with statistical significance in heart doses, all risky organ doses were found to be less.