Orthographic learning in adults through overt and covert reading.

Acta Psychol (Amst)

Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, United States of America; Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, United States of America; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, United States of America. Electronic address:

Published: November 2023

Fluent reading and writing rely on well-developed orthographic representations stored in memory. According to the self-teaching hypothesis (Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151-218), children acquire orthographic representations through phonological decoding. However, it is not clear to what extent phonological decoding facilitates orthographic learning in adult readers. Across two experiments, we manipulated access to phonology during overt (aloud) and covert (silent) reading of monosyllabic and multisyllabic pseudowords by English-speaking undergraduate students. Additionally, Experiment 2 tested whether concurrent articulation during covert reading leads to poorer learning due to the suppression of subvocalization. The amount of incidental orthographic learning through reading exposure was measured a week later with a choice task, a spelling task, and a naming task. Overt reading, which leveraged phonological decoding, led to better recognition and recall of pseudowords compared to when readers read silently. Unlike in previous reports of child orthographic learning, concurrent articulation during covert reading did not reduce learning outcomes in adults, suggesting that adult readers may rely upon other processing strategies during covert reading, e.g., direct orthographic processing or lexicalized phonological decoding. This is consistent with claims that with increasing orthographic knowledge reading mechanisms shift from being more phonologically-based to more visually-based.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11036538PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104061DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

orthographic learning
16
covert reading
16
phonological decoding
16
reading
10
orthographic
8
orthographic representations
8
adult readers
8
concurrent articulation
8
articulation covert
8
covert
5

Similar Publications

Lexical integration of novel words learned through natural reading.

Psychon Bull Rev

December 2024

Laboratoire Cognition Langage & Développement (LCLD), Centre de Recherche Cognition et Neurosciences (CRCN), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Av. F. Roosevelt, 50 /CP 191, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.

Lexical competition between newly acquired and already established representations of written words is considered a marker of word integration into the mental lexicon. To date, studies about the emergence of lexical competition involved mostly artificial training procedures based on overexposure and explicit instructions for memorization. Yet, in real life, novel word encounters occur mostly without explicit learning intent, through reading texts with words appearing rarely.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the realm of logographic writing systems, such as Chinese characters, orthographic transparency fundamentally differs from alphabetic languages, posing unique challenges for individuals with developmental dyslexia (DD). This study employed event-related potentials (ERPs) and a masked priming paradigm to investigate how Chinese children with DD compared to typically developing (TD) children in their utilization of orthographic-phonological mapping rules during the processing of pseudocharacters. The findings revealed noteworthy distinctions between TD and DD children.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Past research from our lab has suggested visual demands in video games serve to exercise attentional-oculomotor processing in a manner beneficial to reading. However, testing the effect of video games on reading typically requires long timeframes (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Encoding and establishing a new second-language (L2) phonological category is notoriously difficult. This is particularly true for phonological contrasts that do not exist in the learners' native language (L1). Phonological categories that also exist in the L1 do not seem to pose any problems.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Orthographic and Meaning Processes in Reading Chinese Compounds: Comparisons Between L1 and L2 Reading.

J Psycholinguist Res

December 2024

Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Research explores the timing of orthographic (visual) and semantic (meaning) processes in reading complex words, particularly using Chinese characters that clearly show morphemes.
  • Four priming experiments were conducted to see how native Chinese speakers (L1) and Chinese learners (L2) differ in their reading processes, focusing on how well they understand the language’s lexical quality.
  • Findings reveal that L1 readers quickly recognize orthographic effects even with short exposure, while L2 readers show both effects only with longer exposure, suggesting that understanding of morphological meanings improves with experience.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!