AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of various comorbidity scores on the survival of lung cancer patients, comparing seven different scores to determine which best predicts four-month survival rates.
  • Data was collected from patients diagnosed with lung cancer who were hospitalized between 2011 and 2015, and multiple statistical methods were employed to analyze the effectiveness of each comorbidity score.
  • Results showed that the Elixhauser score outperformed other scores in predicting survival, demonstrated by higher discrimination metrics and better overall fit to the data.

Article Abstract

Background: The comorbidity burden has a negative impact on lung-cancer survival. Several comorbidity scores have been described and are currently used. The current challenge is to select the comorbidity score that best reflects their impact on survival. Here, we compared seven usable comorbidity scores (Charlson Comorbidity Index, Age adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, Charlson Comorbidity Index adapted to lung cancer, National Cancer Institute combined index, National Cancer Institute combined index adapted to lung cancer, Elixhauser score, and Elixhauser adapted to lung cancer) with coded administrative data according to the tenth revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems to select the best prognostic index for predicting four-month survival.

Materials And Methods: This cohort included every patient with a diagnosis of lung cancer hospitalized for the first time in the thoracic oncology unit of our institution between 2011 and 2015. The seven scores were calculated and used in a Cox regression method to model their association with four-month survival. Then, parameters to compare the relative goodness-of-fit among different models (Akaike Information Criteria, Bayesian Information Criteria), and discrimination parameters (the C-statistic and Harrell's c-statistic) were calculated. A sensitivity analysis of these parameters was finally performed using a bootstrap method based on 1,000 samples.

Results: In total, 633 patients were included. Male sex, histological type, metastatic status, CCI, CCI-lung, Elixhauser score, and Elixhauser-lung were associated with poorer four-month survival. The Elixhauser score had the lowest AIC and BIC and the highest c-statistic and Harrell's c-statistic. These results were confirmed in the sensitivity analysis, in which these discrimination parameters for the Elixhauser score were significantly different from the other scores.

Conclusions: Based on this cohort, the Elixhauser score is the best prognostic comorbidity score for predicting four-month survival for hospitalized lung cancer patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623755PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-01994-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
24
elixhauser score
20
four-month survival
16
comorbidity scores
12
charlson comorbidity
12
adapted lung
12
cancer
8
cancer patients
8
comorbidity
8
comorbidity score
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!