AI Article Synopsis
- Ankle dorsiflexion is crucial for proper foot clearance during walking, especially in stroke survivors, but traditional measures like foot clearance have limitations in assessing dorsiflexor function.
- The study aimed to determine if measuring ankle angular velocity (Aω) and acceleration (Aα) can provide reliable insights into dorsiflexion function during gait.
- Results showed a strong relationship between Aω, Aα, and dorsiflexion function, with excellent reliability for both measures, suggesting they are more accurate indicators of walking ability than traditional measures like peak dorsiflexion angle (DFA) and foot clearance (FCL).
Article Abstract
Background: Ankle dorsiflexion function during swing phase contributes to foot clearance and plays an important role in walking ability post-stroke. Commonly used biomechanical measures such as foot clearance and ankle joint excursion have limited ability to accurately evaluate impaired dorsiflexor function.
Research Question: Can ankle angular velocity and acceleration be used as reliable measurers of dorsiflexion function in post-stroke gait?
Methods: Using linear regression and Pearson's correlation we retrospectively compared peak ankle angular velocity (Aω), peak ankle angular acceleration (Aα), peak dorsiflexion angle (DFA) and peak foot clearance (FCL) as direct measures for swing phase dorsiflexor function in 60 chronic stroke survivors. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis was used for test-retest reliability of Aω and Aα RESULTS: Linear regression models revealed that Aω, Aα, DFA, FCL had a significant relationship (p < 0.05) with impaired dorsiflexion function. Aα and DFA accounted for the most variance of dorsiflexion function. Aω, Aα, FCL, correlated significantly with all clinical outcome measures of walking ability. DFA had a positive correlation only with FMA-LE. Post-hoc William's t-tests, used to compare the magnitude of difference between two non-independent correlations, revealed that the correlation between all clinical measures and DFA were significantly weaker than with Aω and Aα. Correlation between FMA-LE and FCL was weaker than with Aω and Aα. Excellent test-retest reliability for both Aω (ICC = 0.968) and Aα (ICC = 0.947) was observed.
Significance: These results suggest that DFA may only be associated with dorsiflexion function during non-task specific isolated movements, but not during walking. FCL is associated with dorsiflexion function and walking ability measures but not as strongly as Aω and Aα possibly because FCL is influenced by contribution from hip and knee joint movements. Therefore, Aω and Aα are reliable measures and represent dorsiflexion function more accurately than DFA, and FCL
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.10.012 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!