AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to analyze TEVAR outcomes among different weight classes (normal, overweight, and obese) to identify complications, reintervention rates, and short-term mortality.
  • A total of 204 patients were analyzed, revealing that obese patients were generally younger and had higher rates of type B aortic dissection, compared to normal-weight patients who mostly had thoracic aortic aneurysms.
  • Despite the differences in patient characteristics, the study found no significant differences in intraoperative or postoperative complications, reintervention rates, or survival outcomes across the weight categories.

Article Abstract

Background: There are limited studies looking at thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) outcomes in obese and overweight patients. Our objective was to determine the rate of complications, reintervention, and short-term mortality in normal weight, overweight, and obese patients undergoing TEVAR.

Methods: Patients undergoing TEVAR at a large tertiary hospital from October 2007 to January 2020 were analyzed. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts based on body mass index (BMI): normal (18.5-25 kg/m), overweight (25-30 kg/m), and obese (>30 kg/m). Primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year survival. Intraoperative, in-hospital, and postdischarge complications were assessed as secondary outcomes using the Clavian-Dindo classification system. In addition, reinterventions associated with the index TEVAR procedure as a secondary outcome.

Results: Among 204 patients fitting the study criteria, we identified 65 with normal BMI, 78 overweight, and 61 obese patients. Obese patients were younger than the overweight and normal BMI patients (mean age 62.2 vs. 66.7 vs. 70.7, respectively, P = 0.003). In terms of TEVAR indication, the obese cohort had the highest percentage of patients with type B aortic dissection (36.4%), while the normal BMI cohort had the higher proportion of patients undergoing TEVAR for isolated thoracic aortic aneurysm (63.9%). Intraoperative complications did not significantly differ between cohorts. Postoperatively, in-hospital complications, postdischarge complications and 30-day return to the operative room did not differ significantly between study cohorts. Odds of reintervention did not differ significantly between cohorts, both on univariate and multivariate analysis. Log-rank test of Kaplan Meier analysis revealed no difference in reintervention-free survival (P = 0.22). Thirty-day mortality and 1-year overall survival were similar across cohorts. Both univariate and multivariate logarithmic regression revealed no difference in likelihood of 30-day mortality between the obese and normal cohort.

Conclusions: There were no measurable differences in complications, reinterventions, or mortality, suggesting that vascular surgeons can perform TEVAR across a spectrum of BMI without compromising outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2023.09.089DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

obese patients
12
patients undergoing
12
normal bmi
12
patients
10
body mass
8
thoracic endovascular
8
endovascular aortic
8
aortic repair
8
overweight obese
8
undergoing tevar
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!