AI Article Synopsis
- The study hypothesizes that using a Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) is more effective than Endotracheal Tube (ETT) for infants between 28-36 weeks gestation in terms of time and stability during placement.
- Results showed that LMA placement took significantly less time (32 seconds vs 66 seconds) and fewer attempts (1.5 vs 1.9) compared to ETT, maintaining physiological stability in both methods.
- The conclusion supports LMA as a better alternative for surfactant delivery in neonates, requiring less intervention and maintaining patient comfort.
Article Abstract
Objective: We hypothesize that the time, number of attempts, and physiologic stability of placement of an LMA would be superior compared to ETT.
Study Design: Videotape and physiologic parameters of LMA (n = 36) and ETT (n = 31) placement procedures for infants 28-36 weeks gestation were reviewed.
Results: Duration of attempts (32 vs 66 s, p < 0.001) and mean total airway insertion time (88 vs 153 s, p = 0.06) was shorter for LMA compared to ETT. Mean number of attempts for successful placement was fewer for LMA (1.5 vs 1.9, p = 0.11). Physiologic parameters remained near baseline in both groups despite very different degrees of premedication.
Conclusion: Placement of an LMA required less time and fewer number of attempts compared to ETT. Physiologic stability of an LMA was maintained without the use of an analgesic and muscle relaxant. Use of an LMA is a favorable alternative to ETT placement for surfactant delivery in neonates.
Trial Registration: NCT01116921.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01818-x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!